 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Não pode escrever mensagens neste fórum. O nível mínimo de inscrição para o fazer neste fórum é Nível Peão. Modo de acesso: Qualquer um pode escrever
<< < 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 > >> 2. Outubro 2010, 23:21:06 Sounds like if you have a big business and like to trample on the little people.. move your business to the USA!! 2. Outubro 2010, 23:19:37 Assunto: Re: that is why we are truly a free country Vikings: Really? It sounds like the only free 'people' are the big companies who you'll let trample all over you anytime, anyplace.. anywhere..... As long as local law says it's ok.. even if they might be bought (as has happened in the past)... you have no rights but to lobby (timely) or move. .. That's really great... NOT!! 2. Outubro 2010, 23:10:16 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Modificado por Vikings (2. Outubro 2010, 23:10:49) (V): it's obvious that you don't understand the meaning of the UNITED STATES, Each state has the right to make up their own own laws, you see the constitution was designed to protect us, the citizens, from the federal government over reaching it's authority, that is why we are truly a free country 2. Outubro 2010, 23:05:26 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Vikings: Within the law?? Now you are saying you can trespass and affect mob rule on a business. "local business here have been run out of town by not being citizen friendly." What happened to free speech?? 2. Outubro 2010, 23:02:04 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Modificado por Vikings (2. Outubro 2010, 23:03:11) (V): and since you have brought this example up, look at New York, they are loosing many of their highest tax base because they do not like what the local government is doing and the town will suffer untill the will of the people have worked their magic 2. Outubro 2010, 22:59:09 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Modificado por Vikings (2. Outubro 2010, 22:59:25) (V): bussiness have the right to do whatever is within the law,you are twisting it all around, local business here have been run out of town by not being citizen friendly. and I wouldn't want to live in such a corrupt town , they wouldn't be getting my tax money for long, as it is my right to live where I want to live 2. Outubro 2010, 22:50:33 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Vikings: IF it did happen you are powerless you are saying... I mean, some councilmen might have a nice job lined up after via the advertising company and not give a damn. Lobbying can take a while... .. basically it sounds like you are saying businesses have the right to do whatever and your rights don't matter as it's a business? 2. Outubro 2010, 22:45:37 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, (V): That won;t liklely happen as even city councilmen like to be re-elected, and that wouldn't be very likely the case once you brought it up to the attention of the local media, but if that wasn't to be the case, you'd have the right to put up with it or move or lobby against it 2. Outubro 2010, 22:41:51 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Vikings: So if the local gov was bought out ... then what? 2. Outubro 2010, 22:40:18 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, (V): yes you can, it is called local jurisdiction, a city ordinance which is different but you were talking about the federal government not local government, try again 2. Outubro 2010, 22:38:17 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Vikings: Ok.. but someone could if they wanted to place an advert 100 feet tall (with permission of the land owners) opposite your house selling say.. "Obama healthcare works" in neon lights.. and you can't do anything? 2. Outubro 2010, 22:35:10 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, (V): it is a criminal offense here, the severity depends on the situation, ie. inside or outside 2. Outubro 2010, 22:30:46 Assunto: Re: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, Vikings: Isn't trespassing in the USA a civil offence like here in the UK. ie sellers can still knock.. especially if they have no morals... which isn't unusual considering past records on what they will try and get upto. 2. Outubro 2010, 22:19:17 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: I agree it's tasteless, just like flag burning and mosques 2 blocks from ground zero. Our constitution never guaranteed that anything would be easy 2. Outubro 2010, 22:18:34 Modificado por Mort (2. Outubro 2010, 22:28:42) Advert just on UK TV..... A blonde woman dancing with moves suggesting the injection of drugs... she speaks claiming she is our addiction for a perfume who's name is based on opium. Gee.. why not not just name it Eu da heroin!! 2. Outubro 2010, 22:16:57 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: I am posting a sign that warns of trespassing, just like you can do by turning the chanel or complaining and boycotting that particular channel 2. Outubro 2010, 22:14:33 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: Unfortunately, it also means that some whako church group can stand outside a funeral of a fallen soldier and spew tasteless messages 2. Outubro 2010, 22:11:45 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: Yes, unless I post clearly a "No soliciting" sign. And that happens all the time, every time someone makes news, the media camp out on that persons lawn until the story no longer fills their needs 2. Outubro 2010, 22:08:41 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: First it was free speech.. now it's "speech". Make up your mind!!   2. Outubro 2010, 22:07:51 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: selling is a right, it is in the constitution, it's called THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS 2. Outubro 2010, 22:06:14 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution (V): if you look it up on wikipedia you would find out that it was in fact judges that took that right away and tell me how a comercial is not a form of speech, you can't 2. Outubro 2010, 22:04:24 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: Its a privilage to drive, its a privilage to purchase a t.v., its a right to talk 2. Outubro 2010, 22:02:07 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: They were talking about free speech not adverts... you have given NO proof, just an opinion. That.. in the past adverts have been subject to legislation does suggest that you are wrong regardless of your stance of "free speech". As such, it is selling, not speaking or having an opinion. 2. Outubro 2010, 22:00:13 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: apples and oranges, first of all it is up to the states to impliment the drivers liscense and laws. next I'm not aware as to where in the constitution that would be covered 2. Outubro 2010, 21:57:33 You have touch on something very important, the first amendment doesn't require you to listen to those advertisements which goes right back to rods point 2. Outubro 2010, 21:55:55 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution (V): you have given an opinion of your point of view. I haven given you proof that your opinion is just that your opinion(but free speech) and that it is a right of free speech, The amendment doesn't say "except when someone has an opinion as to what is free speech" 2. Outubro 2010, 21:53:04 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday: I like to pause a prog as it starts.. then fast forward past the ads. 2. Outubro 2010, 21:51:26 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: I already have explained my position. You are disagreeing stating it's free speech.. well then. Explain yourself. If you are just exploiting a bit of the constitution to defend your point.. then just say so. 2. Outubro 2010, 21:49:05 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Tuesday:Having a T.V. is not a right, nobody forced you to purchase it, I agree it is annoying tho 2. Outubro 2010, 21:47:50 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution (V): You send a signal to your nerve in your throat and that makes a muscle reverberate and noise comes out and whala speech is formed and that is deemed free by the first admendment you explain how it is not 2. Outubro 2010, 21:43:41 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: Adverts are free speech?? Explain how please. 2. Outubro 2010, 21:42:22 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution (V): it's called free speech! 2. Outubro 2010, 21:41:58 Assunto: Re: Tuesday: to sue the government 2. Outubro 2010, 21:40:54 Assunto: Re: It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution Vikings: I see nothing about TV ads mentioned in your quote. Nothing at all. 2. Outubro 2010, 21:33:27 It's not opinion it's fact, and it is covered in the constitution CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. It is just another example of judges illegally making law 2. Outubro 2010, 20:51:47 Assunto: Re:NO, and that's EXACTLY the point. The constitution had NOTHING about anything as silly as that rod03801: So being as it's not there either way on TV and radio, it's just an opinion that it's not supposed to "insert itself into such matters." .. But then again.. ain't you guys in the USA had rules on things that can be shown on TV, especially regarding sex, foul language and Saturday morning TV? Which implies that the gov does have some right. As for money talks. Please.. we are talking about companies that were happy to use subliminal messaging in adverts... is that still legal? 2. Outubro 2010, 20:44:56 Assunto: Re:his is NOT something the federal government should be concerned with.  (V): NO, and that's EXACTLY the point. The constitution had NOTHING about anything as silly as that, because it's not supposed to insert itself into such matters. Doesn't need to be legal either. People could stop doing business with the offending parties. Money talks. 2. Outubro 2010, 20:37:45 Assunto: Re:his is NOT something the federal government should be concerned with. rod03801: So the original constitution had rules about TV and radio?? "straightened out with the people on our OWN level." Through the legal system which takes how many years? We have OFCOM in the UK.  2. Outubro 2010, 20:22:03 Assunto: Re:they have time to bother with stupid stuff like that? (V): No, I wouldn't say so. I tend to take a more "old fashioned" view on what our Federal govt is supposed to do. As the founders intended, it is supposed to be very limited. This is NOT something the federal government should be concerned with. State? MAYBE, but even then. This is something that could be straightened out with the people on our OWN level. NOT by wasting my tax money. If they ONLY dealt with things that they were INTENDED to deal with, they could possibly do a better job at THOSE things. (I doubt it though. Anything the federal government butts into, they mess up and do it non-economically) << < 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 > >> |
Data e hora
Amigos online
Fóruns favoritos
Clubes
Dica do dia
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos os direitos reservados. Voltar para o topo |