BrainKing - Fóruns de discussão (Backgammon)

Assunto: Re:

Constellation36: Nice analysis. Would you mind if I post it to BrainRook.com site?

15. Dezembro 2008, 07:36:20

Assunto: Re: be careful with Draw offers

AlliumCepa: I think Pedro's point is that spirit_66 suggests that all Romanian players are cheaters (which is how it really sounds like it). And such remarks should not be posted anywhere.

26. Fevereiro 2008, 17:34:49

Assunto: Re: Plakato images not working?

dresali: The images are not available in the bigger size yet.

26. Fevereiro 2008, 09:13:35

Assunto: Re: Fevga

fakar10: Yes, it does.

25. Fevereiro 2008, 19:59:52

Assunto: Re: Portes

Czuch: Nope.

25. Fevereiro 2008, 18:27:53

Assunto: Re: Portes

AbigailII: It is almost correct.

What I mean is that there will be no standalone game called Portes.

1. Junho 2007, 16:11:30

Assunto: Re: New Tournament Type

coan.net: The same system as for doubling cube games.

1. Junho 2007, 14:36:54

Assunto: Re: Triple gammon

Hrqls: No, it's not possible. You must wait.

1. Junho 2007, 13:53:49

Assunto: Re: Triple gammon

Hrqls: No because the tournament system hasn't been changed yet. After the triple gammon is tested, I can add an option to make bigger sections.

1. Junho 2007, 11:24:16

Assunto: Re: Triple gammon

AbigailII: That's a visual bug. The final game will be a normal one too.

1. Junho 2007, 11:23:46

Assunto: Re: Triple gammon

skipinnz: Nowhere, of course. You can set up a tournament.

1. Junho 2007, 10:32:16

Assunto: Triple gammon

All right, test it.

1. Junho 2007, 07:32:56

Assunto: Re: Scoring

nabla:

0, 1, 3, 5 is the final approved version.

31. Maio 2007, 12:57:06

Assunto: Re: Scoring

AbigailII: That seems to be a good solution. I don't like fractions, 99% of BrainKing code is based on integers, not floats.

31. Maio 2007, 07:55:13

Assunto: Scoring

And I don't like the idea of giving 0.5 points for a loss. Is there a logical reason for that?

30. Maio 2007, 17:39:33

Assunto: Re: TTT

Hrqls: By the way, have a look at BrainKing in Turkish, backgammon is translated to tavla and I am sure there are more languages which don't keep the English name.

30. Maio 2007, 17:37:22

Assunto: Re: TTT

nabla: That's much better.

30. Maio 2007, 17:35:56

Assunto: Re: TTT

AlliumCepa: Don't scare me again.

30. Maio 2007, 17:34:24

Assunto: Re: TTT

Hrqls: But I don't like it. And I don't want to work on something I don't like.

30. Maio 2007, 17:29:15

Assunto: Re: TTT

playBunny: TTT might be handy in English but not in other languages. What if I say that it would be implemented only with our own name or I don't see a reason to do it?
Unlike some other site owners, I always think multilingual.

30. Maio 2007, 14:11:49

Assunto: Re: TTT

Hrqls: I think "gammon tournament" would be good enough.

30. Maio 2007, 13:30:10

Assunto: Re: TTT

Hrqls: I don't like "TTT". Find a better name.

16. Janeiro 2007, 12:52:56

Assunto: Re: Runners

skipinnz: Thanks, that's what I needed to know.

16. Janeiro 2007, 12:49:24

Assunto: Re: Runners

Marfitalu: So I am right, am I not?

16. Janeiro 2007, 12:41:38

Assunto: Re: Runners

skipinnz, Marfitalu: Two white pieces on point 1 and two black pieces on point 24?

16. Janeiro 2007, 11:49:31

Assunto: Runners

Can someone please tell me which checkers refer to "back men (runners)" in the standard Backgammon start position?

14. Janeiro 2007, 13:10:13

Assunto: Re:

joshi tm: Since there are no dice, there is no doubling cube.

14. Janeiro 2007, 12:22:42

Assunto: Re:

Czuch Czuckers: Try Grasshopper (just added), there are no dice to kill you.

20. Dezembro 2006, 12:43:59

Assunto: Re: Images

fakarten: I plan to do it.

1. Dezembro 2006, 14:38:13

Assunto: Re: An announcement of a new BG game

grenv: Before the implementation is finished, the rules can be finetuned, of course. I am not a backgammon expert, I've just got a proposal.

11. Março 2006, 16:20:12

It is already fixed for future games.

2. Fevereiro 2006, 07:44:07

Assunto: Re:

Czuch Chuckers: Are you sure this is the correct board for this question?

28. Janeiro 2006, 13:39:19

Assunto: Re:

Pythagoras: All right, since I plan to add 20-30 chess variants, I could add 10 backgammon variants as well.

28. Janeiro 2006, 13:22:34

Assunto: Re:

Pythagoras: What about Grasshopper?

22. Novembro 2005, 15:33:06

Assunto: Re: Feature request

Czuch Chuckers: Are you kidding? I recommend to read twice before clicking.

16. Novembro 2005, 13:27:20

Assunto: Re:

Hrqls: Look now.

16. Novembro 2005, 13:20:13

Assunto: Re:

Hrqls: How dare you to move the board to the page top?

Wait a minute.

16. Novembro 2005, 12:59:44

Assunto: Re:

Hrqls: On top of the board. Look again.

16. Novembro 2005, 12:56:08

Assunto: Re:

Hrqls: The number in the brackets.

16. Novembro 2005, 12:54:58

Assunto: Re: Most moves in anti-backgammon

Vikings: http://brainking.com/cz/ArchivedGame?g=751978
I am better.

14. Novembro 2005, 10:44:10

Assunto: Re:

plaintiger: Ah, now I understand.

Will be done.

13. Novembro 2005, 09:40:11

Assunto: Re:

plaintiger: I still don't understand what should be changed and how.

13. Novembro 2005, 08:32:29

Assunto: Re:

grenv: It is not recommended to use the browser's Back button on a site like this one where all pages are dynamic.

11. Novembro 2005, 10:03:21

I've added it to the rules.

6. Novembro 2005, 20:03:47

Assunto: Re: Resignation warning...

playBunny: I've just made it in red font. But I must also kind of agree with Pedro.

2. Novembro 2005, 08:05:09

Assunto: Grasshopper

pgt: Cool, let me know if you were successful.

Something different - does anybody play Grasshopper? Would it be interesting to implement it here?

2. Novembro 2005, 07:11:27

Assunto: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here

alanback: You are absolutely right.

2. Novembro 2005, 07:10:25

Assunto: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here

pgt: Absolutely wrong. My time is best spent on making myself happy.

Which makes any kind of autopass impossible to be here.

26. Outubro 2005, 19:02:14

Assunto: Re: match vs game etiquette etc

grenv: I don't want to change the system only because of the cube.

20. Outubro 2005, 18:13:24