bwildman: Well, it would appear that my predicition that I made after being removed as a moderator has come true. And remember, I was removed without ever using a swear word, violating the user agreement, and without warning. Since this conversation is avoiding the particulars involved I had to look at who's moderating the boards that I don't read along with the ones that I do to try and make sense of what it is that you guys are talking about. I notice two moderators that have been replaced. One of whom is being defended here and the other no one apparently misses. I am not going to rehash my arguments that I posted about this system of moderation. As it is set up now, it is personality driven and is the perfect breeding ground for favoritism and corruption even if we have good people holding the Global moderator's positions, which is arguable in itself. It's been over two months since my time and Fencer has never said a word or asked a question of me about it. At least from what I've read here about this lastest incident seems to show that some sort of procedures have now been implemented and the people were at least warned to change their ways.

ClayNashvilleTn: I agree with bwildman and disagree with you. This is the perfect forum to air complaints about how this site is run. It's first and only statement says it quite clearly and as bwildman pointed out Fencer could at any time post something if he wants too.

"Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future."

It says everybody and it says structure. What could be more clear than that? Your suggestion to join some fellowship won't work for me and bwildman states one of the numerous reasons that it won't. Hiding it in some obscure fellowship that only some members have access to is just sweeping it under the rug.