(V):   I agree w/ u.  But, here the mentality of our courts is that how you are able to spend your money constutes free speech.  In other words, regardless of whether funds raised are remotely even, candidates have the "right" to allocate their moneys however they see fit - that means any restriction placed upon time limits on commercial time being bought is considered a violation of free speech.

I think this particular mentality is rediculous & has nothing to do with individual free speech as an "inalienable" human right.