 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0) Mod: Toatã lumea poate afişa
28. Iunie 2012, 19:09:29 Subiectul: SCOTUS ruling Mz Pelosi accused Republicans of wanting to "suppress voter turnout" by trying to get Eric Holder to talk. Pelosi can rest easy now, because todays SCOTUS ruling should put concerns of voter turnout to rest. I can't imagine the next Nov election being a repeat of the Reagan/Carter blowout, but I'll be hedging my bets on that one too. I may as well throw it all into the pot and go for broke... what have I got to lose? 28. Iunie 2012, 19:22:00 Subiectul: Re: SCOTUS ruling  Iamon lyme: congress is now voting / debating on holder in contempt 28. Iunie 2012, 19:44:19 Subiectul: Re: SCOTUS ruling Artful Dodger: In every picture I've seen of Holder he looks so sad and put upon. I almost feel sorry for the guy.. but I think that was the point of showing him look like that. |
Data şi ora
Prieteni în direct
Jocurile favorite
Frãţiile
Ştirea zilei
|
|
Drept de copiere © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, toate drepturile rezervate. Înapoi la Început de paginã |