Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Lista posturilor afişate
Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0)
President Obama is planning to sign the FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT. (FOCA) This is something he promised to do if he got elected.
Very briefly, FOCA would: - Eliminate any regulations that currently protect women from unsafe abortion clinics. - Force American taxpayers to fund abortions. - Force every state to allow partial-birth abortions. (They are not forbidden.) - Oversee the conscience rights of doctors, nurses and hospitals that oppose abortion. - Strip parents of their right to be involved in their minor daughter's abortion decision.
Many people believe that abortion is murder..... and even though the laws say that a woman has a right to choose abortion as an option, where do we(our government) get off saying that people who oppose this should be forced to contribute money towards it????
Czuch: I mean.... I have a right to plaster myself with tattoos too, or plaster myself with booze, or even plaster my walls..... but does the government give me money to do it??????
Subiectul: Re: where do we(our government) get off saying that people who oppose this should be forced to contribute money towards it????
Czuch: Exactly right. And partial birth abortion is nothing short of genocide on babies. He needs to rethink that position. I certainly don't want my tax money funding such things.
Modificat de Papa Zoom (3. Februarie 2009, 05:02:23)
coan.net: The problem with the law (as in so many of these kinds of laws) is that there are ambiguous phrases. Here's how the law reads.
"A government may not (1) deny or interfere with a woman's right to choose - (A) to bear a child; (B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to viability; or (C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability where termination is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman; or (2) discriminate against the exercise of the rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information.
In item C, what does it mean exactly the "life" or "health" of a mother. Protect in what way? From death? Or from other things (like being fat is unhealthy and I don't wanna be fat and unhealthy so I want an abortion). I'm not clear on this and neither are many others.
"[The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA)] would sweep away hundreds of anti-abortion laws, policies" - National Organization of Women web site.See Here
This can't be a good thing.
" Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, joined pro-choice members of Congress and activists at a Capitol Hill press conference to introduce legislation that would codify Roe v. Wade into law and guarantee a woman's right to choose in all 50 states. " - NARAL
It seems that this law would remove states rights. I thought the US was in favor of States Rights???
If FOCA is passed, it would automatically overturn
State abortion reporting requirements in all 50 states
I think there's a lot more to this law than people think. It will be a sad day for the pro life movement and unborn children (and parental rights) if this becomes the law of the land. There will be a huge fight over this one and if Obama succeeds, the next Republican president will overturn it.