This is what myself and MadMonkey were saying, the fellowships right now seem to be a little out of control and not at all organised.
We DO need a few rules, or guidelines for us to follow and we'd like everyones idea's on what these should be.
We initially thought it might be a good idea to restrict the number of fellowships a person should be in, but the general feeling on that one seems to be a big 'no'! I can see why, nobody likes to be told they can't do something, especially when some are in several fellowships already and managing very well.
There are also a few concerns about having large teams, and the players not getting to play for the team because of the large numbers. We need ideas what to do about this.
What we'd really like is for people to come on here and give some sound suggestions, then we can put them all together and say to Fencer "this is what we'd all like to see for the future of fellowships, what do you think?"
Or... we could just leave well enough alone and see if it works itself out! LOL!
Hi harley.
I think leaving it alone would be a big mistake.
We need to set guidelines.
My feelings about belonging to more than one fellowship is fine. But I do believe it should be limited.
Three or sounds like good numbers. This will give new fellowships oppertunities to get new members to their own. With out saying, the current fellowships have a great advantage over new ones. We have most of the players tied up with us. If we continue to take new members, they will more than likely join "big" ones vs. a small one. I think maybe for know, the amt of members a fellowship can have might have to be "capped". It's the only way we can get others and new ones to grow.
What is your thoughts?
(ascunde) Dacă te interesează cum avansează competiţia în care te ai înscris,poţi să o discuţi cu adversarul pe tabla de discuţii a acestei competiţii. (HelenaTanein) (arată toate sfaturile)