ClayNashvilleTn: my experience with f/s that are intended to help make changes keeps me from wasting my time with them.
this is an issue that concerns all members...not just the "click" that joins certain fellowships.

bwildman: How are the Global Moderators run unchecked? All (Yes, ALL) the discussion made about global moderating issues are done in a board where Fencer reads and inputs when needed.

The Global Moderators do not want to run the boards, but it is our jobs to make sure the boards are ran according to BK rules.

Discussing it here is not the place. Arrangements have been made to handle such issues where those that are concerned about Complaints of Globs/Mods can observe the details of both parties and draw their own conclusions.

These type discussions do not need to be hammered out on public boards!

Please take it here?

Moderator Complaints

more huffing and puffing in my opinion.
how long will it be before every discussion board is anned by global mods? there are rules and regulations for discussion board mods...yet global mods run unchecked.
will I be removed as a moderator for posing this issue?

BIG BAD WOLF: so why dont you let these people on BK know what the swear word was???
You are making it sound like it was the worst word ever.... why not tell them the truth that it was a minor one, and one that many dont find offensive anyways

LOL it aint number 1 anymore.... belive me

bwildman: At the time that action was taken on the post, that person was the only one on-line, After more Globals came on-line, stronger action was taken. No, the simple task to edit/delete post with language problems is not something that Globals need to discuss - it is the rules of the site to not use foul language, and any moderator or Global Moderator need to follow those rules of the site.

and is a family site.. Please respect our younger members and those who enjoy this site by keeping angry and harsh topics off the MAIN boards.. expecially if there are adequate spots elsewhere to discuss ..

BIG BAD WOLF: bollocks BBW

BIG BAD WOLF: that doesnt answer my question.
why then....if you "discussed it" did the one global mod that this person has a bad history with...be selected to take action against this individual? the board history shows the global that 1st took action.That action was biased,and unfair...especially since it was the boards main moderator that that action was used against.
are you tryng to tell me that the nitial action taken was 1s discussed by all global mods? or are you merely trying to justify yet another example of biased moderating by global mods.

bwildman: The Global Moderators have discussed this issue and many others in detail, and it is not the decision of just one Global that makes and takes action against a person - but something that we agree with as a group. (Note: A discussion that is made which Fencer can read and input on our discussion.)

I really do not want to start giving out the details about action taken with a moderator in public or to other parties other then the moderator affected, and will be happy to discuss it more with the person involved - but I can tell you that it was more then just a "SINGLE word" that lead us to our actions.

ClayNashvilleTn: you as well as me...are entitled to opinions.
global mods are important to BrainKing.com....and as such,members need to kow what they can expect of these individuals.
Last time I checked...this board is for issues concernig BrainKing.com

bwildman:If you are sincere about resolving the problem, there are avenues to do so. Presenting it on this board is inappropriate.

Please use the "Moderator Complaint f/s" or contact one of the Mods that isn't biased against, for whom you speak.

Public discussion of Mods actions, tend to stir trouble and create needless turmoil.

the reason I ask this...some monthes ago,a member used un appropriate language on the Music board.the word was edited by a global mod.
yet...on the Motor board...instad of using this same procedure...this same global mod hide a user for using a SINGLE word...many do not find offensive. is it coincedence this gobal mod seems to dislike this person? how can global mods be "unbiased" if thy allow their personal feelings color thier moderation?
if a global mod has issues with an individual...shouldnt they refrain from any moderation of a particular individual...and let an UNBIASED moderator do the RIGHT thing?

bwildman:Join the Moderator complaint f/s and present your case.

There are several on there open and willing to discuss those issues.

You will find them open and willing to discuss any issue.

what is the use in having global moderators,if they weild justuce unfairly?

Cranky Franky: Yes

Evil Bratt: Yes, but you will need something sharp to scratch it with.

Sorry, I came straight here from the jokes boards...

Do you mean build it from stratch? Using parts to build your own PC?

Can you make a PC with scratch?????

mrloupcity: That is so sweet of you- I couldn't accept that- for the same reason you can't buy more. It wouldn't be fair to the other players, but it's very nice of you to offer. Thank you! I used them- I should have paid better attention. And the good news is that people playing against me know I'll be moving very quickly!!!LOL
Thank you again- that was very thoughtful!

I like the 'get out of jail free card' idea!

baddessi: I would be glad to give u like 5 of my vacation days, if that would be ok with THE BIG BOSS
I just think they should make a get out of jail free card for BG games, so when u get locked on the board. hehehe
:o{P

Pedro- you're dead!!! LOL!!

Whoops! I didn't realize that Black Queen was Black Brain King's wife....guess I'm disqualified.
I just liked the sound of it- sounded kind of 'dangerous'.
And it's also a very good song written by Stephen Stills- one of my favorites : )

How 'bout White Queen? *runs for shelter*

Black queen? I LIKE THAT!

LOL at Pedro- I was gold for a bit..I save up my lunchmoney and do it for as many months as I can at a time. It's a little tight at the moment. But I will be gold again. People have worked hard to keep this place a positive one and it shows!

Fencer- I know it wouldn't be fair. In case anyone should misunderstand, I was only joking

Fencer: doesn't that come with unlimited vacation days? lol

Pedro Martínez: Black Queen position is open too.

baddessi: Right. It wouldn't be fair to other players.

baddessi: That's correct, Barb...:)
BTW, what are you planning uprgrading to? Golden Rook or Maharajah??? :)

Fencer: I don't suppose you get more when you upgrade, do you?
No more till January 1st, right?

Fencer: thanks Fencer. Bummer!

baddessi: No, the database records say you really used all 30 days of vacation this year.

I recently noticed that I no longer have any vacation days. I have had a busy week with some things preventing me from playing as often as I normally do, but I still managed to log on every day and move the quick games that were getting ready to time out. I may have had one or two in the red, but not that many that I know of to have used all my vacation days.
But last I looked, I had something like 17 vacation days left and now they are all gone.
Has anyone else had this trouble- is there some sort of bug?

bwildman: I thought we already had the daggers LOLOL

It's really interesting to see the male/female points of view about the cloak mode!

I still don't see any difference in 'cloak mode' .... I can still see what everyone else is doing .... not that I want to!

Im hidden on members board, shame the person who done it ... dont have the balls to pm me to let me know

bwildman: LOL and rename the site MEDEVIL TIMES he he lol

Andersp: "Cloak" seemed to me strange, too. (But, my opinion should not count in this matter, because I'm no English man). - For Esperanto I translated it with "hidden mode".
Btw., at first it seemed strange to me, why I should see, what my opponents are just doing. Then I thought it over, and now I compare it with a tournament room, where everybody can watch each other. - So, I have no reason to use the cloak mode. My secrets are outside of this room. ;-)
So

Pedro Martínez: Yea..has to be something like that, cant use what first comes to my mind when i see "cloak" :)

Andersp: In Czech, a "masking mode" is used...

Pedro Martínez: trying to translate BK to swedish and cloak is the most difficult word to translate LOL

Andersp: that's how cloaca smells in the Czech Rep. also...LOL

Walter Montego: Do you think it could work to ask an opponent to "uncloak" while we are playing a game? I agree 100% with you, who cares what people are doing but while i play a game and he/she is online its nice to know if i can expect moves back (checking opponents on line).
I support this new feature 100% but i think its very sad that it was needed...in Sweden kloak smells like this

cloak is a perfect name....now all we need is daggers

harley: I thought this site was fine without it, but that's not how it is any more. It seems more balanced having the cloaked ones not being able to follow people around as they aren't letting themselves be seen. As paranoid as I am, I think the whole concept of it is silly. I could care less where someone is as long they would just make their moves when they log on. The cloak did interfer with me playing fast with some people, but most of my fast playing opponents shunned the cloak option and stayed visible. Perhaps with this change a cloaked person might toggle it back and forth depending if they want to play faster or not?

Yes, I read the arguments of AbigailII and pgt. Both of them made valid points for me to consider. I'm glad the cloak has been modified as you say it is now, though I'dve just as soon it had never been installed in the first place.

Walter Montego: Yes, thats how it is now. Personally I don't mind either way, I never used the cloak mode and I didn't mind cloaked people seeing what I'm doing. Nor did it bother me that people are cloaked (even though my friends list went down to three people who were uncloaked!).
But I can see the logic in hiding uncloaked people from cloaked people.

harley: Is that how it is now? Good. I'm no fan of the cloak system, but if there's going to be one then it seems fair to have its use come with some loss for the user too. I mean, if I can't see you, then you can't see me and it is up to the user to use the cloak or not and I can be left out of it completely.

tazman7474: Have a look at feature requests, Fencer says; "Who wants to be hidden, shouldn't have an advantage to see others."

why was the cloak mode changed so that i can no longer see what uncloaked players are doing while i'm cloaked?

Fencer: ah great! thanks :)