Логин: Пароль:
Регистрация нового пользователя
Модератор: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Сообщений на страницу:
Список форумов
Вам не разрешено писать сообщения на этом форуме. Минимальный статус, требуемый для того, чтобы писать на этом форуме - Мозговой Конь.
Режим: Каждый может объявить
Поиск в сообщениях:  

<< <   79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88   > >>
13. Мая 2012, 01:01:47
SL-Mark 
Субъект: Re: Dice Games
Herlock Sholmes: Interesting insight. Thought there might have been a few responses to this.

"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."

I wonder if those that mostly play dice games believe that fate or destiny is general providence and those that play primarily non dice games believe that indeed fate is controlled through their own choices in life!

12. Мая 2012, 18:21:29
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Dice Games

When you look at the statistics, the first 20 games on the list have only 4 games that are not dice-based: Chess (classic), Five in a row (another classic) and two invented and implemented games here: Frog Finder and Knight Fight. It is interesting to think about the reason behind such a popularity of the dice games. In my opinion, dice and the unknown outcome of the roll are somewhat like life itself, where we are getting set of facts and situations that are beyond our influance, and later on we have to deal with them, one by one. And we are never in total control of our lives. Such similarity, life itself and dice games, is what draw us to these games. On the other hand we are like children that need some help from Lady Luck, and when we do not get it, at least we can blame Her for bad fortune. Uknown is what fascinates us in dice games, and unexpected turns of luck is what we are wating for. Even Knight Fight has some elements of luck and unknown because of its random distribution of initial board. I do not know much about Frog Finder, but probably even there are elements of mystery and our goal is to "find what we are looking for ..." . There is one game played without a die, but as a matter of fact, it uses die character. It's Behemot, and what is interesting it not only "rolls" 1-4 spaces, it MOVES in 8 dirctions. It's a fantastic concept, something what "linear" Ludo is lacking.


I would be happy to hear from you about dice games, your ideas and thoughts.


Best regards,


Andy.  


6. Мая 2012, 01:56:38
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re: I love...
ketchuplover: me too

6. Мая 2012, 01:05:44
ketchuplover 
Субъект: I love...
the emotico(n)(m)s here

5. Мая 2012, 14:28:31
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
Aganju: Yes, it seems logical.

5. Мая 2012, 05:41:08
Aganju 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
Mélusine: I would assume 'your own tournaments' means the ones you _created_, not the ones you chose to participate in. You can probably not keep him from joining any tournament just because you are in it.

5. Мая 2012, 04:54:35
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
Fencer: How it works ?
I mean : if I ban someone, I can't sign up for a tournament he has already joined ?
And, on the contrary, if i sign up for a tournament, and then this person wants to join it : in this case, is this person blocked ?
And if he is, does he know why ? Is it written somewhere ?

5. Мая 2012, 04:44:29
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re: I just spent 5 minutes looking everywhere on MY OWN profile for it
MadMonkey: I must admit that I did the same !

4. Мая 2012, 09:23:27
Fencer 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
MadMonkey: If you have a good reason to ban yourself from your own tournaments, just ask me. It's a single click solution.

4. Мая 2012, 09:09:41
MadMonkey 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
Fencer: lol...i think i better go back to bed. I just spent 5 minutes looking everywhere on MY OWN profile for it

4. Мая 2012, 07:25:54
Fencer 
Субъект: Re: Ban from tournaments
rod03801: Yes, it is new. It was requested by people who are permanently abused by slow and annoying players, deliberately ruining their tournaments.

4. Мая 2012, 02:47:15
rod03801 
Субъект: Ban from tournaments
I see a new choice on profiles. "Ban from my tournaments"....

It IS new, correct? Or am I just very unobservant?

2. Мая 2012, 12:15:04
Gabriel Almeida 
Субъект: Re: strange
aaru: It's "more or less" 7. In Portuguese, it means "it's near to 7", so it could be 6.8, 7.1, 7.026, 6.914... :)

2. Мая 2012, 11:58:50
aaru 
Субъект: Re: strange
Fencer:

2. Мая 2012, 11:43:25
Fencer 
Субъект: Re: strange
aaru: I would say it is equivalent to -7.

2. Мая 2012, 10:58:52
aaru 
Субъект: strange
Your expected BKR change: win: 1658 (+35), draw: 1616 (+-7), loss: 1574 (-49)

DRAW +-7 ????

30. Апреля 2012, 03:12:53
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re: if I am right
Universal Eyes: I also didn't know this. I calculated each time. Thank you for the information.

28. Апреля 2012, 21:18:25
happyjuggler0 
Субъект: Re: if I am right
Universal Eyes: Wow, I never noticed that before, thanks! I wonder how many other features there are that I've never noticed at BK.

28. Апреля 2012, 20:12:18
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re: if I am right

Universal Eyes:


yahoooo ! looks great, thanks you so much ... but it doesn't tell me how many numbers are  still needed in each categories and if there is any surplus somewhere in the column or deficyt.


But it helps.


28. Апреля 2012, 20:08:08
Universal Eyes 
Субъект: Re: if I am right
Herlock Sholmes: If you scroll over the blank bonus area you should see how many points are needed to achieve the bonus points.

28. Апреля 2012, 20:01:33
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re:

coan.net:


sounds good, but if you play one game at a time. playing more games, with more opponents there is no way by looking at the table to know immediately where you are. how about displaying in the upper left corner small number telling how many numbers were entered ? or just completely get rid of displaying scores, and showing only how many numbers were entered ... you could then recognize your situation at once.


28. Апреля 2012, 19:46:50
coan.net 
How I try to remember it - as long as you get 3 of each in Triple Dice Poker (3 one's, 3 two's, 3 three's, etc...) then you will get the bonus. (So if you get 4 six's - you know you have 6 additional points to play with... so for example, if I have 4 six's, I know I can get away with only 1 three - as long as I have 3 of each other dice.)

... And then in the 6D version - you need 4 of each dice instead of three.

28. Апреля 2012, 17:17:06
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D

happyjuggler0:


sure, but you still have to remember at least 12 spots ( doubled and trippled column at least) and how many numbers you recorded in them, especially because it displays multiplied values and not how many numbers you recorded.


28. Апреля 2012, 16:38:33
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: if I am right

there should be one more row in the upper section that gives current score for columns, this way we can control how far we are from the limit, and if it make sense to score in the upper section. Now I have to add many numbers to get some idea where I am on  the road to get my bonus.


It would be also nice to have this limits displayed somewhere in columns.


Best regards,


Andy.


 


28. Апреля 2012, 16:37:21
happyjuggler0 
Субъект: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D
Herlock Sholmes: Yes, that is right. I agree the instructions are a bit vague.

One way to think of it is that in triple dice poker, the bonus is calculated by the score that you get if you had scored three of each number, and in triple dice poker the bonus is calculated as if you had scored four of each number.

If you think of it that way, and you realize that you only got three 6's in 6D, then you need to make up that extra 6 somewhere else, for example by getting five 5's and five 1's, or five 4's and five 2's.

28. Апреля 2012, 16:30:17
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D

happyjuggler0:


In order to get a bonus in Tripple Dice Poker, column in the Upper Sections should read:


63 ... 126 ... 189 and in Tripple Dice Poker 6D column should read: 84 ... 168 ... 252 , right ?


I guess it is a little bit cloudy for the players, especially beginners, and should be explained more clearly. 


Thanks for your reply


28. Апреля 2012, 16:13:54
happyjuggler0 
Субъект: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D
Herlock Sholmes: If you look at the rules for triple dice poker, which your game is a variant of, you will see that the score that you need is based on the upper section of the first column. In order to get the bonus for the second column, you need to multiply by 2, and to get the bonus for the third column, you need to multiply by 3.

28. Апреля 2012, 16:01:59
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Tripple Dies Poker 6D

Could someone explain to me the rule of bonus in this variant ? I am not getting it. You are suppose not to reach 84 points to get the bonus (this is the way I understand word "limit")?


In my game I scored way beyond 84 points in the third column and didn't get anything ....


http://brainking.com/en/GameRules?tp=107&fwa=ShowGame!g=5686506


25. Апреля 2012, 01:52:33
Bernice 
ANZAC day,,,,lest we forget

23. Апреля 2012, 22:17:13
ketchuplover 
Субъект: Re: 9 of 193 players...
Bwild:

true that

23. Апреля 2012, 19:04:31
Mort 
... Maybe a yearly top two match, with an award given to the winner

23. Апреля 2012, 15:55:26
Bwild 
Субъект: Re: 9 of 193 players...
ketchuplover: dont get out much,do you? lol

23. Апреля 2012, 15:34:45
ketchuplover 
Субъект: 9 of 193 players...
who first logged on from 1 April 2012 to 22 April 2012 have logged on today(so far)

23. Апреля 2012, 04:12:48
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re:
Bwild: Yes, I succeed in doing it with friends but sometimes, I've enough to ask this.
And friends often say yes because they are kind with me, but they can be bad players and do not like the game.
We come back to what Purple said : people try to keep their rating the most higher possible, so a neutral program for training would be great.

23. Апреля 2012, 04:06:02
Bwild 
Субъект: Re:
Mélusine: you can set games up to be unrated for practice.

23. Апреля 2012, 04:02:43
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re:
Bwild: Yes, the variants are very .
I just regret that here, we don't have a programme for people who want discover a game or else practise.
I'm sure I would play more games, especially variants of checkers.

23. Апреля 2012, 03:56:47
Bwild 
Субъект: Re:
Mélusine: I have to agree with you. I'm terrible at some games...but I like to play,and I learn from the more experienced players who are willing to give me the time.
chess and checkers is tough,due to the large number of program players..but the variants are great fun.

23. Апреля 2012, 03:50:17
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re:
Purple: I agree, it's not fair from him to reject a game with you, but I think we must not impose an opponent on someone : he must be free to play with you or not.
Nobody is dupe ; we often see, here, people who aren't fair (example : people who send an invitation to someone else just for raising their BKR).
Me, I look at my rating, just to see the games where I have to progress, and just to have an idea, but I don't want to be prisoner of this rating, I don't forget that, 1st, I'm here for fun.

23. Апреля 2012, 02:23:53
Purple 
Субъект: Re:
Aganju: TY. I don't like to beat up on a bunch of less skilled players just to get to him but I may have to do it.

23. Апреля 2012, 02:17:58
Aganju 
Субъект: Re:
Purple: I checked, he is playing Checkers in many of the small tournaments. You could just enter yourself into one of those.

22. Апреля 2012, 23:55:14
Purple 
Субъект: Re: invite higher rated players
happyjuggler0: Not that "It's Your Turn" is any role model but their ladders work beautifully. This is a better site but they have better ladders.

22. Апреля 2012, 23:04:30
happyjuggler0 
Субъект: Re: invite higher rated players
Folks, you need to be careful before putting this type of "stairs" thing into BK rules for non-stairs games; there are all kinds of potential nasty unintended consequences.

For example, this could inspire people to change their settings to not accept invitations.

Another downside is wanting to limit number of ongoing games (for non-rooks) in order to make space for a tournament you want to play in, but too many people want to invite you to games and you are forced to accept.

Similarly you might be trying to clear up your remaining games to go on a playing hiatus (a vacation or just to not get burned out on a particular game).

Another potential problem is being forced to play time controls you don't want to play, or match lengths you don't want to play, or single game invitations where your opponent has the side that has a huge advantage (e.g. battleboats plus).

Right now I have a few players on my blocked users list because they were abusive or obnoxious in some other way. I would hate to be forced to play them.

I'm sure there are other potential problems that others can think of. Anyway, I hope Fencer would be very careful before implementing any such "reform" to make sure it doesn't hurt more than it helps.

I have had similar problems with players who are number one ranked while I was number two ranked who refused to play me. It is frustrating. Fortunately for me though none of those rating differences were insurmountable the way the rating difference in checkers is....

22. Апреля 2012, 23:03:19
Purple 
Субъект: Re: invite higher rated players
Thom27: Even a loss would not lose him enough points to drop out of first place..it would just be much closer.

22. Апреля 2012, 22:41:59
Thom27 
Субъект: Re: invite higher rated players
Herlock Sholmes:
maybe this could work:
If an invitation is refused where both players have an established rating and the inviter has the lower rating and the rating difference is not all too big and the refuser has no good excuse (like being a pawn and playing the full number of games) and the players do not already play a game of this type or have played one short ago,
then the ratings of the players are updated as if the game was played and had ended in a draw.

22. Апреля 2012, 22:17:18
Herlock Sholmes 
Субъект: Re:
Purple: I think Bobby Fisher and Alekhine played the same "game" with others. They were the greatest after all. But in this case, maybe there should be some kind of provision or rule that the first guy cannot refuse playing the second one ? What do you think ?

22. Апреля 2012, 18:42:29
Purple 
Субъект: Re:
Сделано для Purple (22. Апреля 2012, 18:42:58)
Resher: For example I am #2 rated checkers BKR but can NEVER be #1 because the top guy will not play me..he only plays those he can beat and he can not beat me. So there is no way out.

22. Апреля 2012, 18:05:53
Mélusine 
Субъект: Re:
Resher: Ah yes, I see. Thank you.

22. Апреля 2012, 17:52:57
Resher 
Субъект: Re:
Mélusine:Yes, use the Statistics tab on the left-hand menu

22. Апреля 2012, 17:43:55
Mélusine 
Сделано для Mélusine (22. Апреля 2012, 17:44:57)
Is there's a list with the average BKR of each player ?
I mean with all the players together, because I know we have our result on our profile.

22. Апреля 2012, 17:13:46
Mélusine 
When the number of players increases, the number of winners goes down.
Of course, it's more difficult to win a tournament with a big number of players, and I think that this result has more value.

<< <   79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88   > >>
Дата и время
Друзья в сети
Любимые форумы
Клубы
Советы
Копирайт © 2002 - 2025 Филип Рахунек, все права зарезервированы.
Наверх