Логин: Пароль:
Регистрация нового пользователя
Модератор: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Сообщений на страницу:
Список форумов
Вам не разрешено писать сообщения на этом форуме. Минимальный статус, требуемый для того, чтобы писать на этом форуме - Мозговой Конь.
Режим: Каждый может объявить
Поиск в сообщениях:  

<< <   91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100   > >>
3. Ноября 2004, 17:38:08
CW57 
Субъект: Pro-checkers
I would like to see pro-checkers on this site.

3. Ноября 2004, 19:06:56
Orlandu 
Субъект: Re: Pro-checkers
Pro-checkers? Is the version where you do not have to jump?

3. Ноября 2004, 20:18:53
harley 
Субъект: Pro checkers
Thats the way I always played as a kid - not having to jump.

3. Ноября 2004, 20:20:28
Jason 
if we didnt jump ,we called it a huff and you lost your piece that you could have jumped with .

3. Ноября 2004, 20:27:11
grenv 
I believe pro checkers is the same as regular checkers but with preset opening moves.

3. Ноября 2004, 21:18:08
Fencer 
In other words, there is no difference. Players just must agree with several opening moves.

3. Ноября 2004, 21:42:10
grenv 
The point is that the game would force the opening. I believe it is to eliminate the advantage (like pente). Therefore the rating would work out better as well.

4. Ноября 2004, 10:13:40
ughaibu 
How about if auto-vacation days were calculated as minus two days each but intentionally set days were counted as minus one?

4. Ноября 2004, 10:14:28
Stevie 
Субъект: Good idea
I guess it would deter those that flaunt it

4. Ноября 2004, 13:52:26
Andersp 
Fencer, do you plan to add "accept all" to game invites?

4. Ноября 2004, 13:53:26
Fencer 
Yes.

4. Ноября 2004, 13:54:56
Andersp 
thanks

4. Ноября 2004, 19:23:53
Shreela 
Субъект: Re: ataxx
I like all the variations of ataxx I've run across, and would play it here for sure.

5. Ноября 2004, 11:58:27
rabbitoid 
Субъект: request
Сделано для rabbitoid (5. Ноября 2004, 11:59:39)
in the messages displayed for a game, add the move number on which they were made.

it would be helpful if in the list of comments, "this was a crap move" was associated to the right move :)

5. Ноября 2004, 19:58:25
The Hunter 
Субъект: an idea I had for a tournament.
what if you could have a tournament where each individual game is random. for example, the first two peope could be playing chess and next two could be playing checkers(basically each game you have could be different from what someone else is playing). You could call it a masters tournament or something like that. maybe you could hold it once a year with some kind of prize for the winner. I think it would be interesting to see who could win dispite the fact that no one would be fully prepared. I can't discribe it well bu I think it would be very fun. just another thought

5. Ноября 2004, 20:41:33
grenv 
That gets me thinking... what about a tournament with different games and you play each opponent once in each game?

6. Ноября 2004, 01:04:47
Bry 
Сделано для Bry (6. Ноября 2004, 01:05:10)
yeah - sounds interesting - you would think that the stronger player in most games would be odds on to win it.... I'd be up 4 it....

6. Ноября 2004, 17:17:44
x7x7x7x7x7 
Be great if you could choose the games in question, like back and Nack, or chess with varients, or other games with related varients.

You would want to double round the chess, though.

6. Ноября 2004, 17:21:32
sLaMdAnCe13 
pLa rEx...

7. Ноября 2004, 19:55:29
ughaibu 
How about publishing a statistic relating the number of members put on enemies to the number of opponents encountered?

8. Ноября 2004, 19:18:04
CW57 
Субъект: Re: pro-checkers
The openings would be selected randomly by the site from 100 plus approved openings. Pro-checkers is generally played in a two game match with the same 3 move opening for both games. This makes it equal for both players

8. Ноября 2004, 22:59:27
THE HIT MAN 
Субъект: Re: pro-checkers
Can it be played without these openings,so no one can program it?

9. Ноября 2004, 19:53:01
x7x7x7x7x7 
Субъект: Not sure if there's a big call for this, but...
A PDA version of the site?

9. Ноября 2004, 21:29:10
ughaibu 
Can we get something on the lines of "defunct" on the profiles of deleted members?

9. Ноября 2004, 22:46:35
CW57 
Субъект: Re: pro-checkers
The 3 move opening is pro-checkers. It doesn't matter if it's GAYP or 3 move pro-checkers, any opening move can be programed.

10. Ноября 2004, 09:24:46
Grim Reaper 
Субъект: perhaps...
...with all the noise going on in the General Chat, a good feature would be to show all of your nicknames in a list, and the dates they were in use. That way you can see all of the nicks that person has used on the same ID.

10. Ноября 2004, 09:45:32
cariad 
Субъект: Re: perhaps...
Nice idea in theory but I suspect a number of people change their nics to confuse or deceive.

10. Ноября 2004, 09:48:00
Stevie 
Thats why it needs to be IP's that get banned, not accounts done singlary ( cant spell) LOL

10. Ноября 2004, 09:51:03
cariad 
Singury, singleary, singlury, singly, singulaly. Doh!
I request a spell czech. :)

10. Ноября 2004, 09:52:13
Stevie 
glad I wasnt the only one who couldnt LOL

10. Ноября 2004, 11:19:47
pauloaguia 
Most ISP's share IP's amongst their clients... not only you won't get the same IP each time you connect but the IP you have one day can become the IP of another client the other day.
Not to mention the fact that there are some people who share the same IP (work at the same company and connect from there or stuff like that).

So IP banning wouldn't work... (I think)

10. Ноября 2004, 13:39:23
Goonerg 
pauloaguia is right, most providers do not give their customers static IP addresses.

you get a different one each time you dial up/ logon

10. Ноября 2004, 16:33:06
Summertop 
You are all correct, IP's are not a good way to track individuals. How many people have a "cable modem" that provides Internet access to multiple computers? Each computer will appear to have the same ip (that of the router/Cable Modem). Unfortunately, i am not aware of a good solution. Was it Intel that wanted to put a unique serial number on their CPU's just for this reason? There was such an outcry and threats to boycott, that they changed their mind. It seems people LIKE their anonymity while browsing.

10. Ноября 2004, 16:36:33
Fencer 
IPv6 is a solution.
But this discussion belongs to Computers board.

10. Ноября 2004, 17:09:48
Summertop 
Would I be yelled at if I post a suggestion that was probably already posted? Oh, well...

When submiting a move for any game, it takes me to the "Next Game". My guess is that the next game is by game ID. Could it PLEASE take you to the next game in respect to my selected sort order on the main page?

There are times I am limited on my time and I just want to make a move for the games that are waiting when I signed on. Invariably, one of my opponents is online and their game keeps coming up before the other games that have been waiting. Sometimes this is very nice, but other times it is annoying. I would like to be able to choose how I want it.

Also, could the resign link take you to the next game (Yes, sometimes I DO lose). Just because I resign a game, doesn't mean I am though playing the other games.

10. Ноября 2004, 18:31:33
Fencer 
Summertop: But it works in this way. Check your Settings page where you can set an order of next games.

10. Ноября 2004, 20:20:03
Summertop 
Ah, so it does...sorry. How about adding a sortable column for "Last Moved"? On second thought, maybe there is more important stuff to do...like add a captured pieces list to the Sabotage games

11. Ноября 2004, 02:05:41
rod03801 
.. as long as the captured piece list doesn't reveal the ranks of pieces you didn't already discover with the spy.. (or whatever that piece is here, lol I forget right now) .. that would take away a major part of what the game is about, in my opinion! but a list of pieces captured that you did reveal, would be good.. maybe just a question mark in the place of pieces whose ranks you didn't learn..

11. Ноября 2004, 07:39:36
rabbitoid 
and while we're at it, could we have an indication of where the stuff was, once the game is over? that goes for all the hidden games such as battleboats, spy or dark chess.

11. Ноября 2004, 07:47:10
Fencer 
rabbitiod: You mean to reveal all pieces (including the captured ones), not just the final position?

11. Ноября 2004, 07:57:38
rabbitoid 
yes. when I lose, I like to see what I did wrong :)

11. Ноября 2004, 07:58:53
Bernice 
heheh rabbitoid...dont we all LOLOL

and looking back on life I wouldnt change a thing LOLOL

11. Ноября 2004, 08:06:35
rabbitoid 
maybe in life you can't start over again after the "game over" message appears... but here you can

11. Ноября 2004, 08:06:36
Hrqls 
i never heard about espionage before i came to this site .. i knew about stratego though .. we played it (dont know if those are the official rules) that when you (tried to) capture a piece your opponent had to reveal that piece to you and you had to reveal it to your opponent .. even if you would lose the capture part

but of course in stratego we didnt have spies like we do have in espionage :)

12. Ноября 2004, 00:22:08
harley 
Субъект: This might have been requested before....
but how about a date at the top of main fellowship pages, showing when that fellowship was created.

12. Ноября 2004, 05:18:16
Jason 
Субъект: Re: This might have been requested before....
not sure the reason for that ? but they are listed in the order that they was created

12. Ноября 2004, 07:09:09
coan.net 
You can also usually take a look at the first message on the boards in the fellowship to get an idea of a date when it was created.

12. Ноября 2004, 10:36:01
harley 
Ah good idea BBW! I was invited to one yesterday and had never seen it before, which got me to wondering when it was created... but I didn't want to join anyway so I couldn't have seen by the messages!

12. Ноября 2004, 14:16:52
Eriisa 
Guess you could join and see, then leave again! lol

12. Ноября 2004, 14:19:23
harley 
ROFL!! Hardly worth it! I was just being nosy, its not really important! :oD

<< <   91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100   > >>
Дата и время
Друзья в сети
Любимые форумы
Клубы
Советы
Копирайт © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рахунек, все права зарезервированы.
Наверх