 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Вам не разрешено писать сообщения на этом форуме. Минимальный статус, требуемый для того, чтобы писать на этом форуме - Мозговая Пешка. Режим: Каждый может объявить
13. Октября 2006, 21:46:55 Субъект: Re: the players are not treated equally 435152: I don't see how you can claim that the better player did not win. Kramnik won despite the fact that he forfeited a game. I think he deserved to win. 6. Октября 2006, 02:54:08 Субъект: Re: bengood24: That's probably the best argument against cheating. He could have lost the first game and should have done no better than drawn it and in game two, he was just dead lost. 5. Октября 2006, 05:06:11 Субъект: Re: world chess championship crisis mctrivia: Ok. But if I read discussion correctly, the issue was over outside help that he could have received in the bathroom (cell phone). However, it really doesn't make much sense. They have refreshments at the events and that could cause the problem. 4. Октября 2006, 14:31:01 Субъект: Re: world chess championship crisis 435152: athletes usually take drugs to enhance physical performance. I don't see how this would help Kramnik. 2. Октября 2006, 00:57:19 Субъект: Re: world chess championship crisis 435152: Why would Kramnik take drugs? 1. Октября 2006, 01:45:27 Субъект: Re: naughtypawn: I think it is pretty stupid and trivial to delay a world championship. |
Дата и время
Друзья в сети
Любимые форумы
Клубы
Советы
|
|
Копирайт © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рахунек, все права зарезервированы. Наверх |