 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Du har inte tillstånd att skriva på denna sida. Lägsta nivå på medlemskap för att kunna skriva i detta forum är Brain Bonde. Läge: Alla kan skriva
22. juli 2010, 23:33:59 Ämne: Democratic Deception  So why is there a regulation about Gold in the health care bill? EO 6102. It's been done before. The Health Care the bill requires that all purchases of gold be reported to the federal government. Shades of FDR. And deception to the core. We any of us told of this before passage of the bill? No. 22. juli 2010, 23:38:41 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Ändrat av The Col (22. juli 2010, 23:39:01) Artful Dodger: Nope, didn't let them off the hook, though it clearly puts a wrench in your narrative 22. juli 2010, 23:42:31 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Jim Dandy: You should focus on the facts, not your bias. Who gave Breitbart the video? When did he receive it? do you know? How do you explain the WH firing of Sherrod and YOU blame Fox in part BUT Fox had not aired ANYTHING RELATED TO Sherrod until AFTER she was fired. How do you explain the fact that the NAACP had the full video and could have put the issue to bed immediately. Why didn't they? 22. juli 2010, 23:43:38 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Artful Dodger: Clearly we disagree, that's fine 22. juli 2010, 23:44:37 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Jim Dandy: It's not a matter of disagreeing. It's a matter of you don't know the facts of this case. Answer my questions. Or admit you don't know. 22. juli 2010, 23:46:44 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Artful Dodger: You're like a dog with a bone, and starting to remind me of my wife  22. juli 2010, 23:48:05 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Jim Dandy: I'll take that as you don't know the facts, can't answer my questions, and yet you have come to a conclusion without those necessary facts before you. Do you always make decisions without the facts? 22. juli 2010, 23:52:02 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Artful Dodger: I want a divorce 22. juli 2010, 23:55:29 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Jim Dandy: I don't mind that we disagree. YOu're one of the few on here that actually makes a case and produces a rational argument. But, you are wrong in this case and the fact that you are running when challenged tells me you really don't know what you're talking about. I suspect you have simply listened to the left wing talking points on the Sharrod matter. Is your wife a conservative? 23. juli 2010, 00:06:36 Ämne: Re: Is your wife a conservative? Artful Dodger: 'my wife" is actually a euphemism for the right side of my brain.I'm not married 23. juli 2010, 00:08:06 Ämne: Re: Is your wife a conservative? Jim Dandy: Answer my questions cuz I won't go away. A simple "I don't have a clue" will do. 23. juli 2010, 00:16:41 Ämne: Re: Is your wife a conservative? Artful Dodger: How many brains is it worth to ya? let's make a deal 22. juli 2010, 23:48:34 Ämne: Re: Democratic Deception Jim Dandy: When challenged, most liberals tuck and run too so you're not alone. |
Datum och tid
Vänner online
Favoritforum
Vängrupper
Dagens tips
|
|
Moderator: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Tillbaka till sidans början |