Prihlasovacie meno: Heslo:
Registrácia nového užívateľa
Moderátor: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Počet správ na stránke:
Zoznam diskusných klubov
Nie je vám dovolené písať správy do tohto klubu. Minimálna úroveň členstva vyžadovaná na písanie v tomto klube je Brain pešiak.
Mód: Každý môže písať
Hľadať v príspevkoch:  

23. augusta 2012, 22:03:35
Mort 
... How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?

Yes, I say policy, for if the idea that Mormonism is Satanism is not a solid 'biblical' statement from God. If it was, then Mormonism would still be as a solid law from God... SaTaNiSm.

But now, the Churches are split... some say yes, some not, some are undecided..

God must be so ... ... fickle!!

23. augusta 2012, 23:22:32
The Col 
Subjekt: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
(V): Power , it's as simple as that.

23. augusta 2012, 23:28:27
Mort 
Subjekt: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
The Col: Not very Christian placing power on Earth over ya so called 'christian values' is it!!

.. It's not a new idea though.

23. augusta 2012, 23:36:23
The Col 
Subjekt: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
(V): They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide.

23. augusta 2012, 23:40:39
Mort 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: Really... how? And isn't that a bit hypocritical... small government, yet you are now wanting to use government to ban abortions!! Even at a state level that's hypocritical.

"McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide."

And what if a visitor arrives from another country, gets raped by a US citizen, ends up in hospital for months and wants to abort, let alone their own women.

23. augusta 2012, 23:43:38
The Col 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
(V): Abortion will be outlawed even in instances of rape or incest, it is in the Republican platform

23. augusta 2012, 23:44:45
Papa Zoom 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: When is it ok to kill a baby in the womb?

23. augusta 2012, 23:48:24
The Col 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
Artful Dodger: Ending a pregnancy brought about by rape and incest is a good idea, no?

24. augusta 2012, 00:05:11
Papa Zoom 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: You're not ending a pregnancy. You are taking the life of a baby in the womb. So just to be clear, you agree that killing a baby in the womb is justified if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest?

What other situation do you agree where killing the unborn baby in the womb is acceptable?

24. augusta 2012, 00:08:54
The Col 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
Artful Dodger: Do you agree a woman should be forced to carry to term a child from rape or incest?
I also agree in ending the pregnancy if the life of the mother is in danger

24. augusta 2012, 00:58:56
Papa Zoom 
Subjekt: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: You haven't answered my original question. You only asked a question in return. We'll get to your questions after you've answered mine. It seems that your position is that abortion is wrong unless it's for the life of the mother or in the case of rape and incest. Is that your position? You oppose abortion in all other instances?

23. augusta 2012, 23:48:20
Mort 
Subjekt: Re: Abortion will be outlawed even in instances of rape or incest, it is in the Republican platform
The Col: I know.... but getting it through!!

I hope they are willing to cover the extra cost that the ER, doctors and hospitals will find themselves spending to help the sick women that result from driving abortions underground.

... But it just about the perceived Bible interpretation being right!! Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life.

egg, womb, women.. irrelevant.

23. augusta 2012, 23:50:43
The Col 
Subjekt: Re Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life
(V): Yes, the masturbation police will be combing the country

23. augusta 2012, 23:53:57
Mort 
Subjekt: Re: Re Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life
The Col: Then what. Back to no condoms??

Good way to increase the US death rates.

23. augusta 2012, 23:24:44
Iamon lyme 
Subjekt: Re:
(V): For someone who does not believe in God, you seem strangely interested in what He does or doesn't do. I've seen this with other atheists, and it doesn't make sense. When I was an atheist, it never occurred to me that I should be concerned about a God that doesn't exist. I wasn't worried about Christians, because for the most part I could see them practicing what they preached. I could be among them, and even argue with them, but I never perceived them as any kind of threat.

On the other hand, if I was among other atheists I quickly learned not to argue with any of them, because if I did it could get ugly and sometimes even unsafe.

It's a little disconcerting when people are promoting peace in a violent way, and I know that at any moment it could spill over to where I am standing. That was a never a problem when I was among Christians. So you can point and cry out "hypocrite" all you want, it doesn't matter to me. I learned a long time ago how hypocrites behave.

23. augusta 2012, 23:32:00
Papa Zoom 
Subjekt: Re:
Iamon lyme: Jules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col. And if one Christian does it, or one Christian organization does it, they lump them altogether. Such deep thinkers.

23. augusta 2012, 23:39:41
The Col 
Subjekt: ReJules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col
Artful Dodger: Why don't you grow a pair, and speak directly to me if you are going to mention me in a comment?

23. augusta 2012, 23:44:12
Mort 
Subjekt: Re: ReJules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col
The Col: Aren't Christians allowed to challenge dogma? I was taught I could!!

Dátum a čas
Priatelia on-line
Obľúbené kluby
Spoločenstvá
Tip dňa
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachůnek, všetky práva vyhradené.
Späť na vrchol