playBunny: "For the sake of expediency because it doesn't affect the outcome of the game."
Yes, true, we know that the player making the last move is the winner anyway. Maybe it really doesn't matter which one the last move is..
What do you think: are both moves legal or only one of them? Why?
If both moves are legal, where is the exception that makes the other legal when it breaks one essential rule of the game?
(sakla) If you want to play a game with an opponent of a similar level, you can define a required BKR range for a new game invitation. Then nobody with a BKR outside this range will be able to see/accept it. (Katechka) (Bütün ipuçlarını göster)