用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

27. 一月 2007, 14:02:14
plaintiger 
can anyone tell me the facts - no guesses nor opinions, please; those are of no interest nor use to me - but rather the facts - about whether a black rook membership may be transferred - whether given or sold or whatever - to a person other than the original owner?

thank you...

27. 一月 2007, 14:06:08
King Reza 
题目: Re:
plaintiger:Ask Fencer.  He's the only one who can give you the 'facts,' and not 'guesses.'

27. 一月 2007, 15:23:29
Czuch 
题目: Re:
plaintiger: I dont see any way for Fencer to prove (with any absolute certainty) if this has been done, nor should he care, really, since he got paid for someone to have all of the benefits of a brain rook FOREVER! It does not say for life, but forever, so it has to be transferable, since non of us can live forever!

27. 一月 2007, 15:28:46
Fencer 
题目: Re:
plaintiger: No, it's not transferable.

27. 一月 2007, 15:35:06
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Fencer: Just curious about the enforcement, it doesnt seem possible?

27. 一月 2007, 16:40:12
danheg 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: I think he can look at ip addresses to have a guess at it.

27. 一月 2007, 18:28:07
Czuch 
题目: Re:
danheg: I use my account when logged on to other peoples computers all the time when I am away....

27. 一月 2007, 18:33:20
coan.net 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: He said it was not transferable - what more do you want? Just because you may not be caught does not make it right. Just like people who use computer programs to play Chess or Checkers on here - just because they may get away with it because it is hard to prove, it still makes it against the rules.

27. 一月 2007, 18:58:13
Czuch 
题目: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: I understand that, I am not a brain dead idiot! I was only curious if he had some way to enforce it?

27. 一月 2007, 17:09:28
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: What enforcement?

27. 一月 2007, 18:25:59
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Czuch修改(27. 一月 2007, 18:26:22)
Fencer: If I was to die, and gave my account to my son, and nobody told you, how would you ever really know? Or even if it wasnt a family member, people move all the time, and IP addys change as well, I just dont know how you can enforce it so somebody does not let another use their account?

27. 一月 2007, 18:40:35
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: When you die, I'll find a solution. Now I have more important problems to deal with.

27. 一月 2007, 19:00:59
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Czuch修改(27. 一月 2007, 19:01:24)
Fencer: When you die, I'll find a solution.



I am going to out live you, so that wont be possible!

27. 一月 2007, 18:41:24
Papa Zoom 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers:  Czuch, in case you haven't noticed.  You're not a black rook. 

27. 一月 2007, 18:42:00
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Gr☺uch☺:

27. 一月 2007, 18:47:54
Papa Zoom 
题目: Re:
Fencer

27. 一月 2007, 18:54:38
joshi tm 
题目: Re:
Fencer: So I've to put my Black Rook in a testament?

27. 一月 2007, 19:13:49
Adaptable Ali 
题目: Re:
joshi tm: Sorry, but that was funny

29. 一月 2007, 23:39:49
plaintiger 
题目: Re:
Fencer: Czuch is right - the black rook option does say "forever". and that word has only one meaning...

if i don't want it anymore, why can't i simply give my black rook membership to one of my friends i know would appreciate it? if it doesn't bring about a change in the number of black rooks on the site, what difference does it make whether it's me or someone else behind the black rook icon? hell, i'd think you'd be *relieved* to have it be someone else.

30. 一月 2007, 05:40:27
nightmagic 
题目: Re:
plaintiger: would we be able to transfer any and all membership, no mater what kind to another if we can?

30. 一月 2007, 05:42:32
nightmagic 
题目: Re:sorry.
nightmagic: i ment that to go to fencer

30. 一月 2007, 07:15:33
Fencer 
题目: Re:
plaintiger: Czuch is wrong. Black Rook is special and it simply cannot be transferred. That's its purpose.

30. 一月 2007, 14:10:43
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Czuch修改(30. 一月 2007, 14:13:43)
Fencer:Czuch is right - the black rook option does say "forever"

(75) - select the "forever" option, (That comes directly from the paid membership page)

Czuch is wrong.


30. 一月 2007, 14:23:45
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: Right.

30. 一月 2007, 14:29:39
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Fencer: A couple of questions, out of curiousity.... If you purchase a black knight, and become a knight forever, how much would it cost to upgrade that to a rook for any length of time?

Also, how come there are an odd number of black rooks,@75 right now, since it was a 2 for 1 special, I would guess the number would be even?

30. 一月 2007, 14:34:18
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: 1) The difference of prices. 2) There were some Black Rooks before the 2 for 1 action was created. Think twice before posting a question.

30. 一月 2007, 14:47:08
Czuch 
题目: Re:
Fencer: Sorry, you know how I get when I am bored, maybe I will go to work now! Cya!

30. 一月 2007, 15:27:35
rabbitoid 
题目: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: and now you're using 4-letter words. work. shame on you!

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端