Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
> if you are taking from the state, then the state has the right to test you for drug use and other "intrusions"
I entirely agree with you on this. People who use drugs and receive social assistance often leave their kids starving on account of their addiction. I think that drug testing should be mandatory in cases where a social worker suspects that somebody is using social assistance money to buy alcohol, cigarrettes or drugs. I think that there should also be a mandatory ban of social assistance recepients from casinos and other forms of gambling. I think casinos should be required by law to turn away people receiving social assistance. In practice it might be difficult to implement such a law, but the problem is that people addicted to gambling will go and bet away their kids' welfare.
The issue of addiction and social assistance is complex. I think that if the state imposes mandatory testing, then there should also be readily available addiction recovery programs. If somebody who wants social assistance tests positive for drugs or gambling, then a mandatory drug or gambling recovery program should be a condition for recieving social assistance as well as strict monitoring of the person's expenses.
The whole objective of social assistance programs is to ensure that the children of low income families receive all the basic needs so as to avoid unnnecessary hardship on low income children. If that is the case, then drug testing and mandatory recovery programs should be part of the social programs aimed at helping low income families. People might argue that it is "intrusive" or "inconstitutional", but the welfare of children should take precendence.
Some of the arguments against these programs are also done on a "cost" basis. People will argue that it is expensive to treat addicts. However, it would seem to me that in the long run it would cost less to provide treatment rather than see all that tax money wasted away on drugs, plus the economic cost of dysfunctional families unable to work or contribute to society.
(verstecken) Du kannst für deine Nachrichten simple HTML-Codes verwenden. Als zahlendes Mitglied kannst du auch den Rich Text Editor verwenden. (pauloaguia) (zeige alle Tips)