I don't think it's a user error. I don't know how I would make an error there. Also, the only thing I changed for it to come to the same conclusion as myself was setting the analysis level to grandmaster instead of expert.
toedder: discussion of a similar position can be found on pp. 66-68 of Improve Your Backgammon by Lamford and Gasquoine.
However, their initial example is at a much different match score: with the cube already "yours" at 2, and with you leading in the match by a score of 3 away / 5 away. Given that situation, the correct cube action is: No Double / Take. (By their methods, you would need to be a 62.5% favorite to bear off in that situation for the redouble to be correct.)
They do also discuss a general approach to the cube decision, given any particular match score. (So, I'd love to know the exact match score in your case--just how early in the match was it?)
Also mentioned in the book is the correct cube action if the position were played as a money game: double/redouble/take
wetware: I am on my phone atm, so I cannot easily look it up. But I am fairly certain that I was 17-away and my opponent 16-away. And as mentioned, GnuBG told me the same when I set this up as a money game. So to me it seems as if the expert level simply has some big flaws when it comes to end game situations.
toedder: I can't reproduce the error on any of the versions that I have (Oct 2005, Nov 2009 and July 2011). Which version of GnuBg are you using and what MET is speciied?
(peida) Oled väsinud mängu algul laevade või Spionaaži nuppude pealepanemisest? Sa võid "Mängude kujundamine" kaudu oma lemmikseisud salvestada. (pauloaguia) (näita kõiki vihjeid)