rednaz23: Yes, thats a very good idea.

rednaz23: I wouldn't recommend it and I'm a guy! The first major reason is that they are WORSE than the internet itself in as much that there are more lies about women in these films than to be found on the Internet itself (and we are not to believe everything on the net!) Many people use that line to avoid dealing with legitimate info about subjects that make them uncomfortable and are sometimes abusive as a consequence. Such can be dealt with at a more appropiate time. For now it is suffice to say that Pornography is riddled with lies about women and defining them as "male oriented" in as much as what gets them excited is concerned! Pornography also ignores the personhood of women by not encouraging interest in there life's history and how it has affected them, or in their personal aspirations or in their real inherant beauty!
The beauty portrayed of woman in pornography is based on the physical aspect alone with the help of cylicone for the breasts and who knows how varied a number of wigs to make them appear sexy. They thus are nothing more than "sex objects" which is demeaning to the average woman and to myself...having been treated as a "sex object" and sexually harrassed by an authority figure who was to supervise me in my volunteer work which I consequently had to quit because I couldn't hack hearing the voice of the authority figure. I made a complaint against him and got him demoted...yes him!
In closing it is important to remind you that these are family oriented boards used by minors as well as adults, by Born Again Christians as well as atheists and all others in between.It is also imperative to remind you that this site is a multi cultural one which suggests a variety of different value systems worldwide on the topic of pornography, let alone that it may be illegal in some countries....especially in the area of being viewed by minors! So I am against this idea 200%

Gentlegiant101: I think that when "xxxxxx" was used, it was not in the context of a porno movie but rather as a fill in the blank title. Obviously the previous would be off limits here