User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364   > >>
4. February 2006, 01:19:01
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Chicago Bulls (4. February 2006, 01:19:33)
Stevie: Yes it would be interesting if the dark people tell us how did they come up with being dark..... Did Fencer proposed that or it was them....? And how they knew it.....?
Too many questions.....

4. February 2006, 01:13:49
Stevie 
surely something should have been announced to everyone?
that was a tad selective and sneaky if you ask me :o(

4. February 2006, 00:17:30
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
furbster: I'm sure there are more people than 4 who know about it.

pauloaguia: You apparently haven't had a chance to taste the glory of Brain Maharajah.

3. February 2006, 23:51:49
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: So... it means that for 28% of the value of a Maharajah membership for one year, you get a lifetime Rook membership? Which has exactly the same benefits... So who'd want to pay for a Maharajah then?

3. February 2006, 23:39:46
furbster 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: How come only 4 people know about this then?

3. February 2006, 23:00:11
playBunny 
BIG BAD WOLF:

3. February 2006, 22:37:44
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Exactly! What a deal, huh?

3. February 2006, 22:36:38
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I saw a post on the Czech general chat board where Venuše said you'd have to pay a least a 10-year rook membership in order to get a life-long one.

3. February 2006, 22:35:27
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: If you do that now, and get the February bonus - does that make it lifetime+ 1/2 of your next life?

3. February 2006, 22:32:41
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Are you sure.....? And where did you see that......?

3. February 2006, 22:29:17
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
pepu: Možeš, ale raději tady:
http://brainking.com/cz/Board?bc=23

3. February 2006, 22:28:10
pepu 
MOŽU SE ZEPTAT: JAK VYTVOŘIT TURNAJ

3. February 2006, 22:24:27
Pedro Martínez 
Buy 10 years of Rook membership and you'll get this Black Rook.

3. February 2006, 20:27:37
playBunny 
Fencer (hide) 3. February 2006, 19:25:28 link
- browsing player list -

reply


Even Fencer's curious about who these Rooks are and what it means!

3. February 2006, 20:27:32
furbster 
I've now got to go offline hopefully by the time i get back it'll have been foudn out lol, bye for now all

3. February 2006, 20:26:55
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: LOL! But madPhilip you didn't answer how do they have Brainking Rook "forever"....?

3. February 2006, 20:26:21
furbster 
Im talked my self through some made up reasons, and im dying to know the real one lol

3. February 2006, 20:26:05
playBunny 
alanback, Fencer:

3. February 2006, 20:25:28
Fencer 

3. February 2006, 20:24:46
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe they have sold their souls to Fencer!

3. February 2006, 20:13:04
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
ScarletRose Mainly, but also to have on your profile a reminder that you are immortal and then realise that this is not true then....

3. February 2006, 20:09:27
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe.. Til death do us Part??

3. February 2006, 20:08:43
furbster 
They've been around for ages alanback! Price on thsoe are negotiated monthly or something

3. February 2006, 20:07:44
alanback 
I see Brain Golden Rooks too

3. February 2006, 20:07:06
Chicago Bulls 
So how the forever occured.....? Fencer? Please hurry up since my curiousity is eating my body....
Also "forever" is not the most appropriate word for various reasons.....

3. February 2006, 19:56:08
ScarletRose 
okay.. I see the forever now.. I must have been lookin at the top activity line.. not realizing it! LOL

Dingy blonde I am

3. February 2006, 19:54:45
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Hmmm I see they have zero for brains also!! Just teasin.. but, they didn't show any brains.. Hmmm

3. February 2006, 19:52:50
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
ScarletRose: I see it saying "forever". The question was brought up here on how they got it.

3. February 2006, 19:51:19
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: So what does that signify?? I reviewed francescolr profile since he holds one of those black rooks.. and he doesn't have major membership years on his..

3. February 2006, 19:48:12
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
alanback: You can go to the player list ( http://brainking.com/en/PlayerList?a=ap ), sort by level type - the "black rook's are mixed in with the regular ones.

3. February 2006, 19:47:58
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
alanback: Just sort the player list by membership level. Black rooks show up among the others... there are 4 total

3. February 2006, 19:47:06
furbster 
I just happened to be browsing tourneys but if you go on online players 2 are online

3. February 2006, 19:45:56
alanback 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Where can you see these?

3. February 2006, 19:43:05
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
furbster: I see 4 total, but don't know why.

3. February 2006, 19:41:00
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
furbster: I guess Filip just hasnt added it to the paid memnbership page yet hehe

3. February 2006, 19:40:12
furbster 
yeh

3. February 2006, 19:39:25
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
furbster: The rook is also diferent.. its black or dark grey

3. February 2006, 19:37:53
furbster 
ok i've seen two of em now.. it can't be just me lol

3. February 2006, 19:33:25
furbster 
How can you be brainrook forever? I'm sure if my eyes aren't deceiving me that i just saw someone with that dexcription lol Unless he's payed for a load of years in advance?

3. February 2006, 17:56:36
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Fencer: Cheers Filip

3. February 2006, 16:45:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Stevie: Wait a minute.

3. February 2006, 16:11:31
Stevie 
Subject: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?

3. February 2006, 14:47:22
furbster 
Subject: Random tournements
I think this is a really cool thing to have, thanks Fencer... something different and fun to have a go at

2. February 2006, 22:39:55
Vikings 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: probably have to be a knight and experiment

2. February 2006, 14:00:26
playBunny 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: [Runs off to Membership Levels] "Hmm, nothing changed there, but then that'll be the last part of any changes. Where else can I look..?"

I wonder what it was you did..

2. February 2006, 13:55:27
Fencer 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: Hmmmm, maybe I did.

2. February 2006, 13:28:35
bouncer 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: I didn't ask you to change anything .I just express my "bad" feeling about this thing. I thought that's why we have "discussion" bords .

2. February 2006, 13:26:59
playBunny 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: "everybody is free to use only features he likes."

Mostly true. Knights who only play a few games can't utilise the tournament system as they might like because of the one-per-game-type restiction. Eg, a Knight in a multi-year Backgammon tournament can enjoy no other.

Unless you've changed that somewhere along the line?

2. February 2006, 13:21:51
Fencer 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
ZEROZERO: If you think it stinks, don't use it. That's what BrainKing is about, everybody is free to use only features he likes. I think it's pointless to discuss in this way because nobody likes everything. Whatever your point is, I don't play to change anything.

2. February 2006, 12:58:18
bouncer 
Subject: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: that's right ...and nobody "forced" me to pay lol ..I was only paying for those members because I wanted them to enjoy this great site and they didn't have enough money to buy a membership or they didn't have a credit card and so on .... at his moment I'm afraid when I see things like this happen .I think the whole "brain" system stinks .. When a player pays a membership for another person I think you should give the brains automatically ...OK...I didn't read the whole stuff about the brain system , cause, as I said, I'm not interested in all that administration rubbish ....but now , more than one year later I cannot sign up for those tourneys ...I think that sucks a bit :)
We'll see what other improvements are coming up but I don't have a good feeling with this first one :(((

<< <   355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top