User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468   > >>
25. January 2005, 09:05:47
The Listener 
Subject: Re: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
Fencer:
I'm 'enery the Eighth, I am
'enery the Eighth I am, I am
I got married to the widow next door
She's been married seven times before
And every time it was an 'enery, 'enery!...

  I'm not what you think I am. And if it be your pleasure to silence me, so be it. However, you cannot destroy Civil Rights, Freedom and Democracy with an edict.

                 Beware of the 'bad press'...

25. January 2005, 09:00:01
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
Modified by Hrqls (25. January 2005, 09:05:43)
EIHN: *sigh* starting again ? didnt we talk this over ? want to continue the talk where we left it ?

hmm a thought occured to me .. do you have me on hide ?

25. January 2005, 08:58:41
Fencer 
Subject: Re: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
EIHN: It's funny to see that 95% of similar complaints come either from pawns or members who were given the membership by someone else. Normally I don't react to something like your post. However, there is one thing I would like to say - I feel sorry for the person who was so kind and paid for your membership because it was obviously a wrong thing. If this is your way how to show a gratitude, you should rather go elsewhere and never come back.

25. January 2005, 08:42:38
Bernice 
Subject: Re: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
EIHN: Perhaps Im wrong, but what or who gives you the right to denigrate and undermine the owners of this site.....May I ask...Did you personally pay for your membership? or get it given to you, or god help us..win it???

I would suggest to you that considering your anti views of BrainKing.com that you relinquish your membership and donate it to a pawn of Fencer's choice.

I can only see that you are trying to disrupt the operations of this site and under those circumstances perhaps Fencer should Ban you :)

It has been done before and no doubt it will be done again LOLOL

25. January 2005, 08:37:06
The Listener 
Subject: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
Modified by The Listener (25. January 2005, 08:43:53)
Hey Pawns,

  Do you want to spend your money on this?...

Paying Membership to this site is not a good idea because:

The people who run this place (BrainKing.com) violate their own rules, i.e. They will harass you, censor you by deleting/hiding your posts, 'bait' you into arguments, and more or less commit transgressions of all sorts.

Also, there has recently been a controversy about posting your favorite song lyrics. The US Copyright Law states that it IS Legal to post lyrics/poems/jokes/stories on discussion boards -- If it is for non-profit and educational purposes only.

The User Agreement doesn't even mention this lyric posting 'rule'. But for some odd reason, some people on this website appoint themselves as 'Judge-Jury-God', and continue to inflict Arbitrary Aristocratic Censorship upon anyone who disagrees with them.
And even if you're a paying member, you'd better get used to this kind of treatment.

So, make sure to consider all of this before you spend your hard-earned bucks here, and watch out...

The Agenda should be 'Fair Use'. And if the so-called owner of this website chooses to ignore the 'Public' law, they should state it up front for ALL to see. To that, I whole-heartedly agree. (At the risk of rhyming )

When they publically state their intention of making this a 'Privately Owned', and therefore, a 'Privately Dictatorial' website -- Then I shall tell everyone to enjoy it as is.

               ~ E I H N

25. January 2005, 05:50:54
redsales 
Subject: another try for CM1000
1) 12 2) 40 3) Be3 solution given on Jan. 23

24. January 2005, 18:25:30
Chimera 
Subject: Re: Re:
Spirou: thanks

24. January 2005, 18:23:34
Spirou 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Spirou (24. January 2005, 18:29:21)
furbster: Shogi may be compared by and large with Loop chess, due the possibilty to drop pawns and pieces already captured (they say "in hand").

24. January 2005, 18:22:19
Spirou 
Subject: Re:
volant: Chinese chess is also an interesting oriental variant of chess. But I don't yet play it, sorry.

24. January 2005, 18:11:31
Chimera 
Is that anything like Chinese Chess?

24. January 2005, 18:06:29
Fencer 
Japanese Chess.

24. January 2005, 18:01:43
furbster 
what exactly is shogi?

24. January 2005, 17:59:13
ughaibu 
Shogi also has lots of variants, so once the basic game is set up we should be well away.

24. January 2005, 17:15:18
Spirou 
Subject: Shogi.
Modified by Spirou (24. January 2005, 17:23:06)
Dear Brainking members,

Our webmaster Mr Fencer is planning to program shogi before the end of this year.

That programming is not an easy task, I am afraid. I think all of us interested in shogi could write a little word in order to boost his motivation (if necessary).

For those who ignore what is shogi, I suggest you take an eye on a Habu's interview. Mr Habu is one of the greatest shogi player of the moment and already an IM at chess!:
>http://www.shogi.net/chessbase-habu.html

You will read that shogi is not a slow, snoothing game at all but a fierce race to mate your opponent.

24. January 2005, 09:01:52
Fencer 
I am fine, thanks.

24. January 2005, 08:28:25
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
red dragon: NO i dont think so...after the first move on any given turn the messages then show up.....besides this person invited ME to a game not viccy verkky LOLOL

24. January 2005, 08:16:04
red dragon 
You could be on their enemies list?

24. January 2005, 07:57:57
Bernice 
Subject: Problem???
on opening a game with some one...there isnt evidence of any messages until after my first turn and then all message for that game appear...it is disconcerting in as much as I dont know if Im being ignored or what... (prolly ignored)...anyone else?

24. January 2005, 07:49:43
Bernice 
Fencer...how is the health?

24. January 2005, 00:31:45
Fiona 
Subject: Re: team tournaments
BIG BAD WOLF: thank you for clearing that up for me

24. January 2005, 00:30:17
coan.net 
Subject: Re: team tournaments
Fiona: The games continue - there have already been a few fellowships deleted in current team tournaments.

24. January 2005, 00:26:19
Fiona 
Subject: team tournaments
i was wondering - if you deleted a fellowship that was involved in a team tournament - what happens to the games, do they just carry on til it finishes or do they get deleted too?

23. January 2005, 21:07:56
ughaibu 
Solutions need solvents, if one needed to dissolve GP what solvent is most efficatious?

23. January 2005, 20:01:53
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: The game of Extinction Chess in the puzzle
Chessmaster1000: Trip, I was telling ughaibu and redsales during our games of Dark Chess that we have going that that game looked familiar! No wonder it does. :) I guess I did miss it. Extinction Chess can end quite suddenly if you see a plan like that.

23. January 2005, 19:25:59
ughaibu 
I'm recruiting volunteers for a test.

23. January 2005, 17:29:42
ughaibu 
132. . . . pond life, evolution, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

23. January 2005, 16:57:23
redsales 
1) 8 2) 40 3) as below

23. January 2005, 16:38:58
ughaibu 
Subject: ChessM
Q1) 5
Q2) 40
Q3) copied from Redsales.

23. January 2005, 15:10:02
redsales 
Subject: just in case
ok, I am reposting:
1) 4 2) 40 3) Be3..etc solution given below.

23. January 2005, 12:03:05
redsales 
Subject: Re:
Chessmaster1000: very good point, I forgot about 0-0-0! But what about the second solution I listed, you didn't mention if it was right:

1 Be3 Qa5 2.b4 Bxb4 and white can't take back with axb4 but now I see the forced win too, which is pretty: 3. Bxf7!! now if Ke7 or Kf8 or 0-0-0, 4. axb4 wins the Q or B next move, if Kxf7, 4. Qf3 Bf5 5. axb4 wins in the same fashion a move later, and if 3..Bxf7 we get the same theme with 4. Qf3 Of course 4..Nd7 allows the R to take N and 4..Ng8 or Nh7 allow the win with 5. axb4 where white wins Q or B next move (6).

23. January 2005, 11:56:24
Chessmaster1000 
Modified by Chessmaster1000 (23. January 2005, 11:56:55)
Walter do you recognise the game? It's one of your extinction games........Against Oliotavio i think.......Only you failed to find the forced win! You won though........

23. January 2005, 11:43:30
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
Chessmaster1000: And remember, as there are no checks in Extinction Chess, there are also no checkmates either. Hopefully you mean on the sixth move something of Black's is extinct, not that he has no way out of it and it will happen on the seventh move. Just asking for clarification.

Right nice puzzles you have here. I think I should give them a serious go if no one has claimed the prize by tomorrow. Time for bed now.

23. January 2005, 11:34:11
Chessmaster1000 
Modified by Chessmaster1000 (23. January 2005, 12:01:24)
All the Maharajah's are not unique of course. A Maharajah is the same of course with another Maharajah.
So the following is not true:"
"A position that has a Maharajah-1 on a1 and a Maharajah-2 on a2 is different from the position that has the Maharajah-2 on a1 and the Maharajah-1 on a2."
Both positions are the same............

As for the Extinction, Redsales after Bb5+ there is the O-O-O! which saves the day(remember you can castle at Extinction when you are in check!).
As for the 1.e5 Ng8 2.b4 Qb6 3.Be3 Bc5? 4.Bxc5 Walter, there is the 3...c5! that leads to no win in less 3 moves.........
And there is no win in less than 6 moves for white.

23. January 2005, 08:49:55
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
Cerebro: Where's my months? :)
Sounds like a fair way to go, but first we'll have to see what the right answers are, and if they've been posted by anyone as of yet. If the answers that I posted are the correct ones, then I was the first one to post all the correct answers. If one or more of them are wrong, then it'll depend on if anyone has posted all three of the correct answers yet. If my answers are correct and he agrees that I should get the prize, we'll work something out. I won't take any of it and let him do as fencer will allow. If I have a wrong answer or if he doesn't allow my post to count though they're correct and first, then what I want to do has less say in what actually is done.

Cerebro I think you have a typo since ughaibu answered Q3 first, not Q1

23. January 2005, 08:23:08
PhatPlaya 臭臭小指 
I think they should split the prize. 2 months for Ed Trice, for answering first Q2, 2 month for Ughaibu, for answering first Q1, and two month for redsales, for answering first Q3 in the shortest number of moves.

23. January 2005, 07:48:33
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: My answer were copied from various parts here
Modified by Walter Montego (23. January 2005, 07:49:36)
ScarletRose: I also copied ughaibu's answer and I didn't hear you complain about that.
Perhaps it's Cerebro prize to claim after all. When will ChessMaster be log on next? I'm waiting to see if anybody has it yet.

23. January 2005, 07:47:31
Bernice 
Subject: CM1000
Modified by Bernice (23. January 2005, 07:49:02)
is a mathematical genius LOLOL and only in his early 20's :) It is good to see :)
I love anything to do with figures only because Im a bookkeeper ...not a genius as LJ will attest to LOLOL, but love to work with figures :) as in numbers..before all you "people" jump on the word figures LOLOL
***EDIT*** i meant to add, have a damn good look around his website...amazing....i dont understand it but amazing :)

23. January 2005, 07:36:41
redsales 
Subject: Re:
BerniceC: I think he meant that the maharajahs were all the same, but if you, for example, "tagged" each one, you could switch the pieces around without disturbing the actual coordinates in the solution(s). From what I know, CM1000 is a math genius, and some of the mathematical proofs he posted on the Goth board were way over my head. Also, for most chess problems the convention is usually that if the problemist writes "white to win in 6" it usually carries the implication "white to win in 6 or less" but I'm not judge or jury here, I'll stop cluttering up Fencer's nice board. Nice little contest though, very stimulating.

23. January 2005, 07:29:46
PhatPlaya 臭臭小指 
Q1) I see only 4, assuming all the maharajas are identical.
Q2) 40, all knights on the white squares, or all knights on the black squares.
Q3) 1. Bb5 C6 2. Be3 Qe5 3. Bd4 or 1. Bb5 Kf8 2. Be3 Qe5 3. Bd4 . Then black's next move and white wins in the 4th move.

23. January 2005, 07:28:27
redsales 
I didn't want to modify my answer because it might change the time stamp, but I meant to write in for Q3)
"Originally I thought [you couldn't play 1. Be3] because of ...."

It just means 1. Be3 works too, but it is a longer solution than 1. Bb5.

23. January 2005, 07:28:12
Bernice 
redsales makes an interesting point that wasnt clarified by CM1000.....
Are the maharajahs unique
god knows what it means but he seems to know :)
we could have 2 winners here, and they could Both be REDSALES sort of...maybe LOL

23. January 2005, 07:19:44
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: My answer were copied from various parts here
Walter Montego: You are so opposed to Ed Trice.. yet, you use his answers.. hmmm

23. January 2005, 07:17:45
redsales 
i wasn't sure if CM1000 wanted 6 exactly. I hope I get bonus marks for paring it down!

23. January 2005, 07:16:02
Bernice 
ooooohhhhh.....57 secs divides the first 2 people with 3 answers LOLOL....drum roll********* who is correct

23. January 2005, 07:15:50
Walter Montego 
Subject: My answer were copied from various parts here
Modified by Walter Montego (23. January 2005, 07:17:48)
I posted all three answers first, though I only know that one of them is correct for sure. But the stipulation was correct answers, not understanding the answers.
I'll give it to redsales if his answer is to the Extinction Chess problem is correct since it's in less than six moves, otherwise to ughaibu.

23. January 2005, 07:12:51
redsales 
ok, here it is:
q1) 4 but 132 if all maharajahs are considered unique.

q2) 40 by placing all on squares of one color.

q3) I have two answers, one is nicer than the other, but both are less than 6 moves.

1. Bb5 black plays either c6 which allows 2. Be3 Qe5 3. Bd4 and white captures the Q or N next move due to the skewer. Or: 1. Bb5 Kf8 2. Be3 Qe5 and the game ends the same way.

Originally I thought because of 1..Qa5 2.b4 Bxb4 and white can't take back with axb4 but now I see the forced win too, which is pretty: 3. Bxf7!! now if Ke7 or Kf8, 4. axb4 wins the Q or B next move, if Kxf7, 4. Qf3 Bf5 5. axb4 wins in the same fashion a move later, and if 3..Bxf7 we get the same theme with 4. Qf3 Of course 4..Nd7 allows the R to take N and 4..Ng8 or Nh7 allow the win with 5. axb4 where white wins Q or B next move.

23. January 2005, 07:11:54
Walter Montego 
Subject: Answers
1. 132
2. 40
3. 1.e5 Ng8 2.b4 Qb6 3.Be3 Bc5 4.Bxc5 Qc6 5.Bb5 and 6.Qxb5 or Bxc6 or Bxe8 or Rxd7

23. January 2005, 07:10:06
ughaibu 
Q1) 4

23. January 2005, 07:07:49
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Re:
Walter Montego: well he definately knows about Gothic Chess wouldnt you say...and I know nothing of it but was interested to see if i could answer number 2. he probably was as well.

Up till now i havent seen anyone give answers to anything except number 2...Mr Trice is the only one :) except Bry and i feel he wasnt being serious LOLOL

23. January 2005, 07:06:11
ughaibu 
Q3) 1.e5 Ng8 2.b4 Qb6 3.Be3 Bc5 4.Bxc5 Qc6 5.Bb5 and 6.Qxb5 or Bxc6 or Bxe8 or Rxd7

<< <   459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top