User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165   > >>
2. January 2009, 17:00:58
pauloaguia 
Subject: Kings Race rules incomplete
Can anybody tell me what would have happened if white had moved the queen to C7? Draw or Win?
Corrida de Reis (pauloaguia vs. jitkasafa)

The rules don't specify what happens in this situation...

1. January 2009, 02:06:53
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
coan.net: regarding #1 

1. January 2009, 01:32:39
Mort 
Subject: Re:
coan.net: I see your point. I think your option "1" is a good idea, and prevent abuse of the system which some do. It's getting like KM again in some ways where a loophole has been found in the system and people are cheating on their ratings because of it by only playing games they will win. Or by making it that some just time out just to get the free space (such as pawns) as the game has been delayed so long.

It's not right.

1. January 2009, 01:25:35
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Snoopy (1. January 2009, 01:53:11)
coan.net: i beleive im right in saying didnt Chad at GT try the exact same thing with vacation days not letting you play at all if you had booked vacation and im sure that didnt last very long because it was a really bad idea

but i like to see no vacation days returned after youve used your quota up except in special causes which you should ask Fencer about

my own case is quite simply i do buy my vacation days back because im able to but i dont actually abuse them
its ill health that stops me keeping up with things
so to penalise someone by not gaving any back thou ill health is kinda scary to me

1. January 2009, 01:22:02
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
(V): That would not work. I know when I visit my sister-in-law, all she has is dial-up, and I set vacation days - but do try to stop by and play a few games - if playing the few games would take me off of the vacation and make may games time out - that would be bad.

Another example would be if I have about 10 games ready to time out (but on vacation), try to play 1, and then suddenly have the other 9 time out because I did not play fast enough because the system took me off vacation would also be bad.

(So doing that would only slow games down more since it would encourage players to not even try to visit the site if they can)

The things I would like to see fixed:

1. Don't allow people more vacation days if they renew their membership. I know this has been done in the past - sometimes multiple times in a row. If anything, maybe a 1 time thing were you get 10 additional vacation days if a membership is purchased, but never more then 10 days. (even though I would like to see it as 0).

2. .... there was something else I was just thinking about, but it escapes me right now.

1. January 2009, 01:06:44
Mort 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Yep, but why can't there be a little update to the holiday system. If you move on a day then you can't be classed as being on holiday. As it is upto the player to play the least time games first as I think most of us do so we keep our holiday for genuine reasons.

1. January 2009, 00:37:45
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:

1. January 2009, 00:03:23
Fencer 
BrainKing has just turned to 2009, so all vacation counters should be reset.

31. December 2008, 19:17:01
Bernice 
Subject: Re: vacation days
Modified by Bernice (31. December 2008, 19:47:19)
rod03801: yes and it is unfortunate that something can't be done about it as well.....a bad loop in the system it is.......
and the person you are talking about is paid up to 2014, surely that indicates he is rorting the system when it comes to moves, and it was only a couple days ago he was whingeing and whining about not being able to get another paid up year..........

31. December 2008, 12:46:34
rod03801 
Subject: Re: vacation days
Hrqls: There are a couple players (or at least one, that many know about) who has had at least 90 (possibly 120!) vacation days in 2008 because of doing this. Not fair at all to the other players in any tournaments they are holding up.

31. December 2008, 10:39:45
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: vacation days
Bernice: that will have to mean he has to buy another year of membership every 7 weeks (35 days + 7 weekends) .. i dont think anyone will do this just to prolong a game

30. December 2008, 21:59:26
Bernice 
Subject: Re: vacation days
rabbitoid: all he has to do is what the other person does on here........buy another years member ship, and you can go months without even moving....he does this when he is losing a game, just to make it difficult for other people in tournaments..

30. December 2008, 13:53:55
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: vacation days
Fencer: Thanks, good to know.

30. December 2008, 13:52:21
Fencer 
Subject: Re: vacation days
rabbitoid: No. If someone sets vacation days for the next year, the counter will be properly deducted.

30. December 2008, 13:50:04
rabbitoid 
Subject: vacation days
Modified by rabbitoid (30. December 2008, 13:52:48)
by the way: I have this opponent who sets vacation days for next year, out of his stock from this year. Then, come Jan 1st, he can add to them.

This is surely not the way this is intended to work. why, in a couple of years he can set 365 off days! Now, if I could figure out the way to make this gimmick work for me on my job -

Why this guy ever paid for a black rook, if he goes this far to find loopholes in order not to move in games, is beyond me.

30. December 2008, 13:45:35
furbster 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Ok thanks, i couldn't quite remember but i thought that was the case.

30. December 2008, 13:42:59
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
furbster: Yes.

30. December 2008, 13:40:11
furbster 
Do we get new vacation days as of January 1st?

29. December 2008, 20:13:03
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: question on time outs
Pedro Martínez:  thanks  

29. December 2008, 20:11:40
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: question on time outs
Artful Dodger: I woudn't call it a "grace period", but games time out approx. 5-6 minutes after the time runs out.

29. December 2008, 20:11:25
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: question on time outs
Artful Dodger: i think its checked once every hour ... but i could be mistaken :)

29. December 2008, 20:09:12
Bwild 
Subject: Re: Site;
Modified by Bwild (29. December 2008, 20:10:20)
WinterAngel: there is a webtv fellowship, I believe...you may join and find the answer to your questions there.

http://brainking.com/en/ShowFellowship?fid=85

29. December 2008, 20:02:14
Papa Zoom 
Subject: question on time outs
is there a grace period for timing out on games or do they time out exactly when time runs out?

27. December 2008, 22:49:03
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
Vikings: ah so..................thanks for that............

27. December 2008, 22:47:12
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: It wont let you move your piece that is in the 6 spot because you wouldn't then be able to move a second piece so you have to move your piece that is in the 11 spot first

27. December 2008, 22:38:10
Bernice 
Hyper Backgammon (Bernice vs. Pepi®)

can someone look at this and tell me why it wont let me move

26. December 2008, 09:16:34
Bwild 
Subject: Re: Smileys
rabbitoid:guess it depends on which way you look at it :O)

19. December 2008, 16:40:10
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Smileys
rabbitoid: Yes a smile when it comes to the thought of my Grandkids.. haha.. way different then when the babies were my children..

19. December 2008, 11:35:56
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Smileys
ScarletRose: no objection to the description, but do you mean to tell us that with you, during the administration of the treatment, the subject resembles, even remotely, to a smiley? lucky you!

19. December 2008, 09:08:13
Mort 
Subject: Re: Smileys
Eriisa: Don't forget the wiping, especially on those icky teething ones.

19. December 2008, 05:26:36
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScarletRose (19. December 2008, 16:40:40)
 Tuesday:  

19. December 2008, 03:38:55
alanback 
Subject: Re: Smileys
Eriisa:Man was I confused until I remembered my original question ...  Thanks!

19. December 2008, 03:38:18
alanback 
Subject: Re: Smileys
ScarletRose:There's no sticky strips on my smileys!!

19. December 2008, 01:13:40
Eriisa 
Subject: Re: Smileys
alanback: Settings > Javascript....



THEN you lay them on the table.. get some powder and a fresh diaper.. Then.. tear back the sticky strap.. and discard the icky poohie diaper.. Dust with powder and restrap the new diaper..

19. December 2008, 00:20:44
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Smileys
alanback: first you lay them on the table.. get some powder and a fresh diaper.. Then.. tear back the sticky strap.. and discard the icky poohie diaper..
Dust with powder and restrap the new diaper..


19. December 2008, 00:12:44
alanback 
Subject: Smileys
How can I change my favorite smileys?

17. December 2008, 18:01:45
Czuch 
Subject: Re: another pawn issue
pauloaguia: you are right... I guess this one has too many sides for an easy, one size fits all, solution.

17. December 2008, 15:34:26
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: another pawn issue
Czuch: I can see some reasons why people could prefer to still receive those messages.
I think you still have the hability to get out of the fellowship... or you can always ask the BB to kick you out

17. December 2008, 15:05:11
Czuch 
Subject: another pawn issue
Fencer, if you are going to change some pawn things around.... when you revert back to a pawn, you should not receive group fellowship messages anymore, my box is full of them, and I cant even get in there to change my preferences, it should just be automatic?

17. December 2008, 09:39:29
Mort 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
Hrqls: Funny thing was that the lady at MS did not know anything about the policy... I had to send a copy of the email to her from the laptop company. That's when they/she said sorry.

17. December 2008, 09:33:16
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
(V): a free copy of xp sp3 ? nice! i should call them as well ;)

please move this discussion to the computer board

17. December 2008, 09:16:29
Mort 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
rabbitoid: I don't.... I've only seen two articles on MS recently. This one and another which reported a mess up by MS over a patch that caused some people to lose the internet connection thanks to compatibility problems with a firewall program.

.... I in that case had to phone MS to find out which patch to remove.

.... Oh there has been one incident regarding MS though over policy which I took them to task relating to a laptop makers ability to keep software before a certain date that was basically essential if the laptop went unstable and needing a complete wipe and reload.

..... In the end MS said sorry and sent me a free copy of XP sp3 for my partners laptop.

17. December 2008, 07:20:11
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
rod03801: So this time the "wolf" cry really corresponds to something? My apologies to (V), and of course this doesn't change much my opinion of MS products.

17. December 2008, 02:08:18
rod03801 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
rabbitoid: True, but this also made the News today too.

16. December 2008, 23:54:07
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Serious security flaw found in IE
(V): yawn

I'm no big fan of MS, but this is something I get hundreds of by email each day. My /dev/null folder is always hungry

16. December 2008, 20:46:46
Mort 
Subject: Serious security flaw found in IE
Users of Microsoft's Internet Explorer are being urged by experts to switch to a rival until a serious security flaw has been fixed. The flaw in Microsoft's Internet Explorer could allow criminals to take control of people's computers and steal their passwords, internet experts say.

Microsoft urged people to be vigilant while it investigated and prepared an emergency patch to resolve it.

"Microsoft says it has detected attacks against IE 7.0 but said the "underlying vulnerability" was present in all versions of the browser."

"The message needs to get out that this malicious code can be planted on any web site, so simple careful browsing isn't enough."

16. December 2008, 01:59:33
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: am i right in saying
Snoopy: Yes, you are.

16. December 2008, 01:23:17
Nirvana 
Subject: Re:
alanback:but they make yummy cocktails

15. December 2008, 21:29:39
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Czuch:Seems especially harsh, since prawns can't live out of water

<< <   156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top