Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Please try it now. You should be able to join another team of the same game type, even if the team tournament is still running. But you cannot do it if the current tournament is in the "sign up" status, just to avoid joining more than one team for the same tourney.
the bigger the teams needed the less games people have to play in a team tournament .. isnt it ?
lets say we have 120 players ... which can be either 10 teams of 12 players or 20 teams of 6 players
the 10 teams of 12 players let all 12 players of each team play against the corresponding player of all other teams .. giving 9 games per player in a team
for the 20 teams of 6 players this would mean 19 games per player in a team
The section size also affects the number of games played. Assuming the section size is constant, the number of team players doesn't affect how many games each player playes - it is simply (games against each player) * (teams per section - 1).
i didnt look at the section size .. but people said they didnt want to play with teams of 12 persons because they would have to play too many games that way .. that confuses me
I actually didn't want to play in such a large tournament because i fear i will die of old age before it finishes, that's all.
Actually that's been a problem with all the team tournaments, one slow player means the sections don't finish.
It would be better if at least a match could be decided by winning more than half the games instead of waiting for everything to finish. Until then I will probably not play them.
jasons games room needs 2 team players for crowded backgammon can anybody help out ? bkr not important .
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\
|| |Jasons Games Room | ||'"""|""""\__,_
I____________________ l ||___|__|___|)
(@!)'!(@)""""""""""****|(@)(@)****|(@)
only around 3 days left before the team tourney starts
Also to those who have asked, I will start back up the "Fast Start" tournament after the first of the year (or maybe before if I can get caught up on things.)
Are you just learning how to play some of the games? Have you wanted to try some new games, but were afraid? Well, then, let's learn to play them together!!! And maybe make some new friends along the way. Scheduled to start after Christmas...take a risk...sign up for games you've never tried...and most of all, LET'S HAVE FUN!!!
Are you like me, a fair game-player, but your BKR indicates otherwise? Are you unrated in some games, and just want to HAVE a rating? Would you like to play other people who share your position? Then join this tourney for any game in which your BKR is less than 1700. Set to start on New Year's Day, this tourney is restricted to those whose BKR's are less than 1700 (any game). Even if you have earned a high BKR on some games, and are just working on others, join the ones where your BKR is low! Most importantly... HAVE FUN!!!
One thing confuses me Nirvana, these tournaments are named after your fellowships right? So how come you do them as general tournaments rather than purely in the fellowshiops?
Why is that confusing? this way more people get to play them ~ pawns included, some of which are very good players and some of which have since become members , so it is good for BrainKing as well as for players. I don't have to name them ~ it's just something I do.
I want to make some remarks on the following tournament.
Fast Start - First 5 to sign - Backgammon #575 (Backgammon)
The tournament was opened to start on 5th December, and today, 18th December, all of the games have been completed - except for one player, ARPA, who has not made a single move in three of the games.
I have repeatedly asked him politely if he would mind making some moves, but to no avail.
At the risk of being accused of taking a cheap ride, I have today upgraded my membership from Brain Knight to Brain Rook, so that I cannot be accused of sending this message for the wrong reasons. It is entirely reasonable for play restrictions to be imposed on those not contributing, or not contributing very much!
Now as a Brain Rook, I would like to state my case strongly! This tournament was advertised as "fast start" and in my simple mind, that also implied "fast play". I find absolutely no fun in playing tournments which last a month, let alone a year. I could well be dead before this tournamnet is over if ARPA does not make a move soon.
I checked up the games outstanding of the other player in the tournament, and they were 315, 80, 254, and 22. ARPA had 795 games outstanding! Why would somebody want to enter a tournament when that many games were outstanding? Did he REALLY intend to play in it?
I agree that something needs to be done. Perhaps limiting vacation between moves to twice the length of the move limit. For example, in your case, there is a 3 day limit per move, so vacation time between moves could be limited to 3 extra days (6 days total).
Sorry pgt and Thad u feel this way. but it has been brought up by lots of people. Again sorry more then not they r just using up their vacation time they have left. But when they put on this site an auto vacation, I truely think the BIG BOSS or head people for this site did not think that somepeople would use it to take the fun out of the tourneys.
This is a turn base site and after u become a rook member u get 30 days vacation. And there is no rule that says that u can't use them all in a row.
And if u read the rules they can take the full time they have to make there moves. Yes lots of us don't think it is very sporting for people to do this but, they r not breaking any rules.
WoW been a long time for me to write this much at 1 time. Sorry moderators this is off topic but just thought they would like to know that it has been talked about over and over again.
I'm aware of the RULES. This country has some bloody stupid laws, too, but just because they are laws is no reason to lie down and accept them. They need to challenged if they are not the RIGHT rules.
I agree, people are indeed playing within the current rules. But the rules need to be changed. And yes, the idea has been discussed before, but I thought my idea (about limiting the length of vacation time to double the length of the move limit) was original and deserved mentioning.
Fencer, I think that that would be a GREAT idea - or maybe even restrict vacation days to 3,4 or 5 days for the ENTIRE tournament. But what I still don't understand is why anybody would want to sign up for a tournament and then not take part for three weeks. I think that's just completely inconsiderate.
I have created the New Year Janus Chess Open for all players!
The best games of this tournement will be published in the German chess journal "Rochade Europa"!
Fencer - when you do have it possible to have tournaments/games with no vacation days allowed - hopefully they will show up on the game sheet a little differently, or able to sort no vacation games a little differently in case you do plan to take a vacation, you can try to hurry and play those game quickly. :-)
Modified by bwildman (18. December 2004, 14:33:40)
WTG PGT!!! thank you for supporting our site! As a rook,you can now join as many tournaments as you like,and when the "slow"players do finally move,it will be a pleasent surprise.