ChessCarpenter: I do not want to bore the members of this site by addressing details, which are unkown here. But one point indeed seems to need clarification. This is concerning the repeated assumption, it would have been easy there to continue a broken game. This has not been the case at all within the GC tournament. The missing of a publised how-to for such occurences has lead to unnecessary quarrels and offendings. Imagine how frustrating it is to argue through such stressing situations using a foreign language to rebuild a game, where your opponent is blocking, moreover even not having a game notation at his hands.

Why there has not been provided a documented modus operandi for such cases? I finally have worked out such a rule set and tried to suggest that at the GC forum. The result of that approach has been a threatening to be excluded from GC live, which helped not at all to have broken games fairly rebuilt.