Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Übergeek 바둑이: I don't think it's complex at all. I think the question is rather simple; it's the explanations and obfuscations that get complex. That there is a life of some kind involved is beyond question. The kind of life that "it" is, is human. Therefore it's a human life. This is a solid scientific fact. So that question really has to do with the human life that is ended in an abortion.
If you argue it's not a human life, and if you were correct, then there should be no debate. If it's not a human life, kill it. If it is, then it's not a complex question at all. It's not right to take the life of a human being (and it is a human being from a scientific point of view) without just cause.