Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
O čem je toďten plk: Re: The option "show smileys" does not work
El Cid: If I try with your ongoing games list, it works, but not with my own games. When I click on the "opponent" selection box, there is only a line displayed: ----------
O čem je toďten plk: The option "show smileys" does not work
I switched it off some weeks ago. The smileys dissapeared not immediately but after some days. About a week ago I switched them on again, but they are not yet displayed.
If they are switched off, there should be at least the number of the smiley displayed, and not just nothing.
Filtering the list of one's ongoing games by opponent does not work also, since some months.
Looking at the date the person joined BrainKing, the date he last logged in, and the number of moves played would seem to make this a slam dunk to have the game voided.
Iamon lyme: From the FAQ's : 3.1.2) I play a game with no time control and my opponent stopped moving, so it seems that the game will never finish. What can I do now?
If it is really clear that your opponent will not play the game anymore (for instance, he stopped logging in BrainKing 2 months ago), please send a message to the administrators and the game will be deleted. However, it is recommended to think twice before accepting a game invitation with no time limit and that's why a warning in bold red letters is displayed at the game invitation page, so you always play such a game at your own risk.
Thanks for the draw info, I suspected it might be something like that.
I have another question. I'm playing someone who tells me one of her games has no time limit, and her opponent stopped making moves over a year ago. Can she get an administrator to step in to void the game? I would like to know too, if something like this ever happens to me in an obviously drawn game that never seems to end.
I sent a draw offer in one of my games, and then got a message that my opponent had sent me a draw offer... but when I looked at the game, there was no draw offer. Did my offer get sent to me instead of my opponent? The game is obviously a draw, but I'm not sure if my opponent got my message or not.
Bluefin: hi bluefin, i have tried it out and if you block someone, he will not be able to see your new games waiting for opponents. but if you open a tournament, you need also to ban him from tournaments you open, both links for doing it are in the players profile that you want to block...
thisbeme: "Some games don't end if you can't move, you have to pass! e.g. Lines of Action/backgammon/Ludo"
And if the rules claimed those games used "standard CHESS rules", your point might actually be relevant.
Stalemate is in fact quite common in chess. It's the most common cause of draw with the exception of agreement to draw between the players. There are entire books written on how to cause stalemate and how to avoid it. It's a basic rule of the game.
The rule say this is how to finish the game ends and that condition isn't met.
HOW many times has stalemate happened??? It is obvious a very unlike occurence given the nature of the game!
Maybe the person who wrote that rule isn't "smart enough" to realise that stalemate is a possible outcome :P
Something may seem common sense, but someone had a go at me for not knowing that linetris wasn't connect 4 and told me to read the rules.
The phrase "how to finish the game" is very clear in meaning and creates the assumption that that all finishing scenario will be covered under the clause! Ask any competent lawyer to look at those rule and they should see that there is a problem, if you tell them that these rules adequately cover the stalemate possibility accurately!
Stalemate should be arguably not permitted like is the case with check or the game end in a paradox, as one player has no legal move and the so called end conditions are not met.
How can a game that hasn't met the finish condition be over?
Some games don't end if you can't move, you have to pass! e.g. Lines of Action/backgammon/Ludo
The rules mention "How to finish the game" and it is an omission to not mention the possibility of stalemate.
It is reasonable to expect the game is not finished when the conditions are not met?
Since check is forbidden, why assume stalemate is the same when there is a section on how the game end that could include stalemate and doesn't mention stalemate?
The rules need amending, had the rule been clear I would have played another move!
"the game is finished..." if stalemate is consider to end the game it should be mentioned, it was not probably by accident because it was not considered by the games creator/author of the rule on this site. The game should not end if you haven't fulfilled the "finishing conditions!"
"The game is finished if one player moves own king to the last row. However, when white moves his king to the last row, and black moves directly after that also his king to the last row, the game is a draw, in order to compensate white player's advantage of making the first move."
ketchuplover: probably more than you can dish out.. He has awards for the one with the most moves.. and you pretty much have to consistantly move the entire 24 hours with no thoughts.. hope you can hold going to the potty! ;)
ketchuplover: Not sure what you mean? When I transfer money, it goes into Fencer's personal account. Nobody gets anything of it. (I have no idea what he does with it, though) If you use PayPal, they take their share as with everything going through them. I don't know the percentage (as they don't want me as a customer), but it can't be so bad.
I just received (at 9AM) a message saying I'm the winner of a tournament, with the text "you are the winner of this tournament". However it does not say which tournament. Moreover, yesterday I had 31 running tournaments and today I have... 31 running tournaments (I don't remember starting any new one). Is this a "spam" message, a bug, etc.?
rod03801: thx a lot rod03801...it's really interesting that other refer the same problem. but not all users or boards seams to be affected, this makes it tricky for the support...
speachless: As someone else said, I think this is something new. As though the image recently disappeared. I haven't noticed it up until now. But I know I'll be looking more carefully on my few current plakato games.
thisbeme: me i even didn't had to switch to small board size, cause it already was, but anyway the graphic is missing, this is what irritates me so much... but anyway, i don't think filip fencer will care, it seams to me he didn't take it for serious cause he's convinced i just need to switch to the small board size.... what already is! i think i will just stop playing plakoto...