 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
8. Luglio 2010, 20:42:31 Argomento: Re:You need about 400 square miles of wind turbines to equal 1 nuclear power plant. Modificato da Pedro Martínez (8. Luglio 2010, 20:46:08)  (V): My post was a response to your statement that “It makes you wonder how much our reliance on big power plants could be reduced if they [electricity generating windmills] became a standard.” As for my figures… my source is Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power (“A typical 1000-MWe nuclear reactor produces…”) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_turbine (referring to this table indicating the outputs of different wind turbines) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power (see the part on capacity factor) As regards the article on the Buena Vista wind farm… yes, there are larger and more efficient wind turbines, as well as there are larger and more efficient nuclear power plants. I was comparing the average figures. |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Moderatore: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |