Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201   > >>
15. Gennaio 2006, 06:12:24
playBunny 
Argomento: Graph page links
It would be handy if the player's name on a graph page could be a link to their profile. And perhaps the game name shown in brackets could be a link to the associated finished-games page?

15. Gennaio 2006, 22:37:31
IndiagonalJones 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
Fencer:

I have talked with many players about international checkers on a board 10X10 and in your reply to jolat you say that it can be done but have to be reworked first. Does it mean you have still the intention of making it available on Brainking anyway and can we have an idea of when.
I think you may loose many Europeen players of international checkers as it's already implanted on IYT and they will prefer play there...

16. Gennaio 2006, 02:11:05
Czuch 
Would it be difficult to make our "moves activity" (how many moves we make in a day) correspond to our own time zone instead of the "server time"?

16. Gennaio 2006, 07:18:29
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
IndiagonalJones: I think you may loose many Europeen players of international checkers as it's already implanted on IYT and they will prefer play there
Don't believe that.

16. Gennaio 2006, 07:19:24
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Yes, it would be difficult.

16. Gennaio 2006, 08:30:20
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
IndiagonalJones: In other words, nothing can be seen only in black and white. International Checkers is a great and interesting game, no doubt, and I definitely want to add it. But it is still a game which affects only one group of BrainKing users. The site stability and performance is always my highest priority because it affects all users. I don't say there are serious performance problems at the moment but there are minor issues which could become serious performance problems in the future, that's why they must be resolved as soon as possible.

16. Gennaio 2006, 12:27:41
WhiteTower 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
Fencer: ... and that's why we keep asking you, Fencer, to keep us informed on a regular basis about a loose schedule of what you plan to do. Surely it shouldn't have taken a question about Int. Checkers to provoke you to reveal this behind-the-scenes issue :)

16. Gennaio 2006, 12:31:39
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
WhiteTower: I am not sure if informing on a regular basis would make much sense because in most cases it would contain only "I don't want to reveal this behind-the-scenes issue because it's too complicated to explain" :-)

16. Gennaio 2006, 15:42:20
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Light shed on dark games
Fencer: Neither do I. I dropped IYT in favor of BrainKing.

16. Gennaio 2006, 16:15:40
jolat 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da jolat (16. Gennaio 2006, 16:16:13)
Me also, I gave up IYT at the profit of Brainking, in particular because I prefer to privilege a European site (I am french) and then, because I hoped that the game of "International Checkers" would be installed here.
Unfortunately it is not yet the case. International checkers is my preferred game and if I cannot exploit it on this site, it well will be necessary that I will see elsewhere.
It will be with regret because I like the features and the spirit of this site.

16. Gennaio 2006, 16:52:34
alanback 
Argomento: Re:
jolat: Even so, I find it hard to believe you would abandon this site altogether for lack of one game. It seems to me more appropriate to play that single game elsewhere. Of course, you are free to do as you wish! Chacun à son goût ;-)

16. Gennaio 2006, 22:39:08
WhiteTower 
Argomento: Re:
jolat: If there's one thing that Fencer would like us all to appreciate about his efforts, it's our patience and trust for his making sure that the website is stable and secure, while adding new games and features. Doing things the other way round wouldn't work out very efficiently.

As for IYT... who here has forgotten the mess that its creator had to go through when the system completely crashed, dumping all player data all the way to hell?...

17. Gennaio 2006, 00:43:04
Baked Alaskan 
Argomento: :)
IYT sucks




No comparison

17. Gennaio 2006, 03:08:28
rod03801 
Back on topic please!
:-)

17. Gennaio 2006, 03:40:55
plaintiger 
i'd like to enter - again - my plea for the ability to add notes to the names of the blocked users on our lists, like we can for our friends. it's a nuisance having to keep my notes telling me why someone's on my blocked list in a separate location like the notepad, and it's even more of a nuisance to look up the notes that way.

one of my blocked users is a dangerous, viciously hateful person - really. he should be locked up and the key thrown away - and i don't want to forget why he's on that list.

well, i do and i don't, if you know what i mean.

but when all you've seen of a person is a name and a photo, it's surprisingly easy to forget what else you know about them - that it's them you know it about, and all that. notes next to their name would help.

17. Gennaio 2006, 08:25:58
Bry 
Argomento: Re:
plaintiger: It is even more confusing when the user changes username and photo etc.

Perhaps something like the "Event History" that comes up whenever someone is hidden/banned by a moderator would help?

17. Gennaio 2006, 08:57:15
plaintiger 
Argomento: Re:
Bry: hmm. that's a good idea. like eBay's username history thingy.

the notes/description option and that would make it very easy to keep track of who's whom (and who used to be whom) and what they've done that led us to block them.

17. Gennaio 2006, 09:01:46
Fencer 
Right.

17. Gennaio 2006, 09:24:53
plaintiger 
and if i may veer ever so slightly for just one post: i'm happy to report that the person i thought was so horrible really wasn't at all responsible for the horrible act that was attributed to him. the act was more likely the doing of his accuser...who has a reputation around here anyways...

ugh. politics. i'll stop right now.

17. Gennaio 2006, 10:58:22
toedder 
Argomento: another move and goto request ;)
on the game page after moving it would be nice to have an option "...and go to next game with friend".

18. Gennaio 2006, 02:08:40
mctrivia 
Argomento: BKR Percentile
I know others have requested it but it would be really nice if the ranking wasn't 30th place but 30 th out of 88. And sorted by the value 30/88=0.341. As right now spear froglet shows up as my best game not because I am really good at it but because not many have been rated yet.

18. Gennaio 2006, 20:24:53
Czuch 
Argomento: Re: BKR Percentile
mctrivia: I like that idea as well....

18. Gennaio 2006, 20:41:54
alanback 
Argomento: Re: BKR Percentile
mctrivia: YOu don't like being a big frog in a small pond?

18. Gennaio 2006, 23:54:47
mctrivia 
Argomento: Re: BKR Percentile
alanback: I just would prefer that spider line 4 showed up higher as I am 69 out of 242

19. Gennaio 2006, 16:25:00
ColonelCrockett 
Argomento: Re: BKR Percentile
mctrivia: I like this idea, also. It would put a players true skills in better perspective.

21. Gennaio 2006, 12:50:43
playBunny 
Argomento: "Lost" messages
When I decline an invitation it would be handy if a copy of the message were added to my Outbox like other messages. I tend to explain why I've declined rather than just say a word or two or none. It would be nice to know what I've said to whom. Also to be able to cut and paste into the next invitation that I'm declining for a similar reason.

21. Gennaio 2006, 12:55:48
TC 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
playBunny: I second this idea!

21. Gennaio 2006, 12:56:16
Adaptable Ali 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
playBunny: good thinking

21. Gennaio 2006, 18:59:49
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
playBunny: As far as copying & pasting, until something like your request happens, using notepad for what you describe is great. (You probably already realize that! :-D .. This is more for those who might not have thought of it) My notepad is mostly filled with messages/descriptions that I use frequently.

21. Gennaio 2006, 21:57:03
Czuch 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
playBunny: Not declining any invitations might be helpful as well
;)

21. Gennaio 2006, 23:34:04
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
Czuch: "Not declining any invitations .."

And that would be helped by a rating formula that doesn't award me nothing for a win and a loss of -15 points against an opponent who is going to win 25-30% of our matches simply because of handy dice!

21. Gennaio 2006, 23:37:33
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
rod03801: Aye, that's a good idea, I have the most frequent message templated in my notepad. What prompted the request was an invitation from someone who I may have had one from before. I can't remember, nor, if so, what my reply was.

21. Gennaio 2006, 23:40:07
MidnightMcMedic 
How about a default message, "thanks but no thanks." its short, polite and to the point.

22. Gennaio 2006, 03:23:04
alanback 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
playBunny: If you're honest and straightforward, you will probably say the same thing now that you said before.

22. Gennaio 2006, 03:37:05
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: "Lost" messages
alanback: Alternatively, if I'm a devious liar then I'll probably say the same thing now that I said last time.

On the other hand, if I'm the person that I am then I'd want to continue the theme rather than repeat it - refering to old information and adding anything new.

Talking of old information, this topic's exhausted.

22. Gennaio 2006, 11:27:22
plaintiger 
Modificato da plaintiger (22. Gennaio 2006, 11:32:00)
can the games that have been added to the site since the Stairs were created be added to the Stairs? i'm thinking of sphere froglet, but there are probably others.

22. Gennaio 2006, 11:29:43
plaintiger 
oh, and i think *all* messages we write outside of games and message boards should appear in our outboxes. there shouldn't be any "lost" messages, IMO.

22. Gennaio 2006, 17:02:45
coan.net 
Argomento: re: Adding games to stairs
plaintiger: And something I mentioned before, but it would be nice if fellowships which have stairs - if the big bosses could add/remove games from stairs also. That way if a new game is added to the site, they do not have to create a totaly different set of stairs for just the 1 game, but be able to add the 1 game to the stairs which have already been on there way.

22. Gennaio 2006, 18:53:02
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: re: Adding games to stairs
I asked Fencer about this in a game recently, and he said it is planned.

22. Gennaio 2006, 19:58:13
alanback 
Argomento: Ranking graphs
It would be nice to have graphs that tracked our position in the rankings as well as the ones that track our ratings!

23. Gennaio 2006, 01:35:43
plaintiger 
i'd like the little green "this person is online" dots that appear next to players' names in my games list to appear next to their names on the gameboard screen. that way, if one of my opponents and i are both online and moving regularly on a game - almost-real-time play - i can leave that game on my screen as if i was sitting at a physical board, and if my opponent goes offline i'll know it and stop waiting for Her to move without having to check my main page every so often to ascertain Her online/offline status.

this would make the fact of the gameboard pages refreshing just like the main page more useful. thanks, Filip. :)

and of course you're right, BBW.

23. Gennaio 2006, 04:36:56
alanback 
Argomento: Re:
plaintiger: To get what you want you would also have to have autorefresh on game screens -- do we have that?

23. Gennaio 2006, 04:39:04
mctrivia 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da mctrivia (23. Gennaio 2006, 04:39:43)
alanback: Yep there is an autorefresh.

23. Gennaio 2006, 07:48:16
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
plaintiger: Instead of a green dot, you can see your opponent's current action on the game page. If there is no action or the action is "logging out", the opponent is not online.

23. Gennaio 2006, 09:42:52
plaintiger 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: doesn't work when you're cloaked.

23. Gennaio 2006, 09:55:54
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
plaintiger: Don't be cloaked.

23. Gennaio 2006, 09:58:11
ScarletRose 
Yes.. we wanna see what you are up to.. *giggle*

23. Gennaio 2006, 10:44:53
tonyh 
Argomento: Cubed Backgammon
When you are totally blocked from getting back onto the board, it is a bit of a pain having to roll the dice.
Could you fix it so that we just press 'Submit' instead, please?

23. Gennaio 2006, 10:59:09
plaintiger 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: how did i know you were going to say that?

"don't be cloaked" is not a solution. please try again. :P

23. Gennaio 2006, 11:43:39
Fwiffo 
I would like to have the ability to give the opponent more time when (s)he's in danger running out of it.

<< <   192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio