 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com この掲示板でメッセージを作成にはナイト会員以上の会員レベルが必要となりますので、あなたは作成権限が有りません。 モード: 誰でも投稿可能
16. ７月 2003, 15:21:13 件名: Re: ratings That isn't in the Elo system which is what the USCF uses, which is what we use. A ratings system that takes into account dates is Glicko and Glicko2. 16. ７月 2003, 16:42:39 件名: Re: ratings It is also in the Elo, they mark ratings from player who did not play enough games in the last year with an *, anyhow the FIDE (The world chess federation)does so, I am not familiar with the USCF way to handle this 16. ７月 2003, 17:03:11 件名: Re: ratings Well, its not in the formula, but FIDE marks players like that to keep their rating list up-to-date. They don't recalculate the rating or anything just remove it from their Top 100 List. Bobby Fischer still has a 2700+ rating, he just isn't shown on the list. 16. ７月 2003, 17:45:50 件名: Re: ratings For that you're right, but they don't count the 10 or 20 year old games played by Kortsnoi or Karpov in there actual rating 17. ７月 2003, 04:28:20 件名: Re: ratings UIL and Tactician-- I think the number of games played by an opponent should be irrelevant. Why does it matter? Once a player is established, who cares? I think ti is absurd that I gain more opints winning a game against a 2000 player with 50 games than against a 2000 player with 45 games. 21. ７月 2003, 08:27:48 件名: Re: ratings I agree, never said it had to be that way |
日時
オンライン友達
気に入り掲示板
同好会
今日のアドバイス
|
|
著作権 © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek. 上へ |