Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
> But then you also ,again, have to contend with other family forms as well, IE polygamy, brother sister, father son, right?
Two other western taboos are polygamy and incest.
Incest was acceptable in ancient Egypt and the pharaohs were often married to their brothers/sisters in order to preserve the purity of their divine blood. It led to serious genetic defects being passed on to their children. For example, Tuttankhammon suffered from spina bifida. The Bible rejects incest very early on. After escaping from Soddom and Gomorrah, Lot and his daughters were cursed because they had an incestuous relationship. Our modern objection to incest comes from the possibility of passing genetic mutations or diseases to children. As such incest remains undesirable and to me it is unacceptable in any form.
Poligamy is different because it is a form of marriage that survives into our modern era both in western culture and outside of western culture. I know of two cases in southeast Asia. I know of a "monk" in Singapore who had two wives. I met one of his daughters who kept referring to her "auntie" and how cute her little brother was when he was playing with his mom who was also her "auntie". Obviously that "autie" was her father's second wife. I know of another case in Laos. This wealthy man had 13 children with 3 women. The common denominator here was wealth. Polygamy is a priviledge of the wealthy.
Among Tibetans it was not uncommon for a woman to have several husbands. Marriages involved the transfer of property among families and for many families it was economically unfeasible to "purchase" a wife for every male in the family. For this reason several brothers would often marry the same woman. It was acceptable socially because Tibetans believe that a man inherits his father's bones, therefore all brothers had the same bones from their father and if any of them had children with the woman, the children inherited the same bones. Polyandry still survives in some places in Tibet and Nepal. Poligyny (having several wives) was also common in Tibet where wealthy men could acquire several wives.
In India the Mahabharata describes a case one one woman marrying five brothers, so both polygyny and polyandry were acceptable. Of course, the ancient Israelites had polygamy as attested in the stories of Abraham, Solomon, David, etc. Judaism abandoned polygamy in the 11th century and today polygamy is illegal in Israel.
Polygamy became unacceptable during Roman times. The Greeks had monogamous relationships, and the Roman's inherited monogamy from the Greeks. In the 4th century St. Augustine formally accepted monogamy as the acceptable form of marriage among Christians. Ever since western culture became monogamous. Those values have gone around the world and many countries today have monogamous laws.
The question is: Is polygamy acceptable? Here in Canada the government has had a lot of problems with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons). Some of its sects engage in polygamy. It has become a serious issue because in some cases girls as young as 13 have been married, with and without their consent. On the one hand there are issues of the rights of women and young girls, on the other there are issues of religious freedom. Polygamy remains illegal here and it will remain so in spite of the constitution guaranteeing religious freedom. The government does not want to open that can of worms.
The Mormon church in Utah officially excommunicated those who practice polygamy, so the practice remains only among a few sects. I would believe that the Mormon sects following polygamy had a legal case on constitutional grounds, but many marriages are with women under the legal age for marriage, and that women are denied full rights to education.
I don't know if polygamy is acceptable. In a case where the people involved are of legal marriage age, fully aware of their actions, without coercion or subterfuge, and in full view of society and the law, would it be acceptable? In some countires it is, in other it isn't. It might sound desirable to some men, but isn't having one wife trouble enough? What about division of property and divorce? Cultures where polygyny is acceptable often have vague laws or laws that disfavour women. It is one of reasons why polygamy remains unacceptable in most places.