Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Forumlijst
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

6. juli 2007, 03:12:44
kintori 
Onderwerp: Re: social contract
Aangepast door kintori (6. juli 2007, 03:15:05)
danheg: \
this is at the core
player(sender) opponent(receiver)
as the game had not been started ie no moves
moves have to be made before a draw can be asked even GM draws have a number of moves made before the draw is given.
the social contract as such is this
the opponent: one, did this on his own without consulting the team as a whole or the captain, this is a team match
two, there was no attempt to ask the player if this was a mistake.
the second level is this, the ranking difference of 100+ between player and opponent
at the least opponent was just plan RUDE, at the other end he reverse cheated
in that he sandbagged player knowing that the draw offer was not a real offer and accepted so he would not have to play a much stronger player and get a 1/2 win for free. the worst kind of cheater coward
oh he has not yet resoponed though it did take him very long to accepot the draw

Datum en tijd
Aanwezige vrienden
Favoriete Forums
Genootschappen
Tip van de dag
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
Terug naar boven