Toezichthouder: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

Forumlijst

Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten

Toon oudste bericht eerst

31. juli 2012, 23:03:35

Papa Zoom

toon berichten van deze speler | link

Aangepast door Papa Zoom (31. juli 2012, 23:03:54)

Muller not a skeptic in 2003, either

More and earlier evidence that Berkeley’s Richard Muller was never a skeptic.

From EthicsAlarms.com:

Here’s is Prof. Richard Muller, a Berkeley physicist, toward the conclusion of his 2003 paper on global warming data:

“Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of
paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of
fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history.
It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.”

Earlier, it was pointed out that in 2006 Muller rated himself as two-thirds alarmist.