Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Berichten per pagina:
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Pion.
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
3. januari 2009, 18:12:14
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Constellation36: Nice analysis. Would you mind if I post it to BrainRook.com site?

15. december 2008, 07:36:20
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: be careful with Draw offers
AlliumCepa: I think Pedro's point is that spirit_66 suggests that all Romanian players are cheaters (which is how it really sounds like it). And such remarks should not be posted anywhere.

26. februari 2008, 17:34:49
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Plakato images not working?
dresali: The images are not available in the bigger size yet.

26. februari 2008, 09:13:35
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Fevga
fakar10: Yes, it does.

25. februari 2008, 19:59:52
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Portes
Czuch: Nope.

25. februari 2008, 18:27:53
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Portes
AbigailII: It is almost correct. What I mean is that there will be no standalone game called Portes.

1. juni 2007, 16:11:30
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: New Tournament Type
coan.net: The same system as for doubling cube games.

1. juni 2007, 14:36:54
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Triple gammon
Hrqls: No, it's not possible. You must wait.

1. juni 2007, 13:53:49
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Triple gammon
Hrqls: No because the tournament system hasn't been changed yet. After the triple gammon is tested, I can add an option to make bigger sections.

1. juni 2007, 11:24:16
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Triple gammon
AbigailII: That's a visual bug. The final game will be a normal one too.

1. juni 2007, 11:23:46
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Triple gammon
skipinnz: Nowhere, of course. You can set up a tournament.

1. juni 2007, 10:32:16
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Triple gammon
All right, test it.

1. juni 2007, 07:32:56
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Scoring
nabla: 0, 1, 3, 5 is the final approved version.

31. mei 2007, 12:57:06
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Scoring
AbigailII: That seems to be a good solution. I don't like fractions, 99% of BrainKing code is based on integers, not floats.

31. mei 2007, 07:55:13
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Scoring
And I don't like the idea of giving 0.5 points for a loss. Is there a logical reason for that?

30. mei 2007, 17:39:33
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
Hrqls: By the way, have a look at BrainKing in Turkish, backgammon is translated to tavla and I am sure there are more languages which don't keep the English name.

30. mei 2007, 17:37:22
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
nabla: That's much better.

30. mei 2007, 17:35:56
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
AlliumCepa: Don't scare me again.

30. mei 2007, 17:34:24
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
Hrqls: But I don't like it. And I don't want to work on something I don't like.

30. mei 2007, 17:29:15
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
playBunny: TTT might be handy in English but not in other languages. What if I say that it would be implemented only with our own name or I don't see a reason to do it?
Unlike some other site owners, I always think multilingual.

30. mei 2007, 14:11:49
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
Hrqls: I think "gammon tournament" would be good enough.

30. mei 2007, 13:30:10
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: TTT
Hrqls: I don't like "TTT". Find a better name.

16. januari 2007, 12:52:56
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Runners
skipinnz: Thanks, that's what I needed to know.

16. januari 2007, 12:49:24
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Runners
Marfitalu: So I am right, am I not?

16. januari 2007, 12:41:38
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Runners
skipinnz, Marfitalu: Two white pieces on point 1 and two black pieces on point 24?

16. januari 2007, 11:49:31
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Runners
Can someone please tell me which checkers refer to "back men (runners)" in the standard Backgammon start position?

14. januari 2007, 13:10:13
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
joshi tm: Since there are no dice, there is no doubling cube.

14. januari 2007, 12:22:42
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Czuch Czuckers: Try Grasshopper (just added), there are no dice to kill you.

20. december 2006, 12:43:59
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Images
fakarten: I plan to do it.

1. december 2006, 14:38:13
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: An announcement of a new BG game
grenv: Before the implementation is finished, the rules can be finetuned, of course. I am not a backgammon expert, I've just got a proposal.

11. maart 2006, 16:20:12
Fencer 
It is already fixed for future games.

2. februari 2006, 07:44:07
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Are you sure this is the correct board for this question?

28. januari 2006, 13:39:19
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Pythagoras: All right, since I plan to add 20-30 chess variants, I could add 10 backgammon variants as well.

28. januari 2006, 13:22:34
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Pythagoras: What about Grasshopper?

22. november 2005, 15:33:06
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Feature request
Czuch Chuckers: Are you kidding? I recommend to read twice before clicking.

16. november 2005, 13:27:20
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Hrqls: Look now.

16. november 2005, 13:20:13
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Hrqls: How dare you to move the board to the page top? Wait a minute.

16. november 2005, 12:59:44
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Hrqls: On top of the board. Look again.

16. november 2005, 12:56:08
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Hrqls: The number in the brackets.

16. november 2005, 12:54:58
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Most moves in anti-backgammon

14. november 2005, 10:44:10
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
plaintiger: Ah, now I understand. Will be done.

13. november 2005, 09:40:11
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
plaintiger: I still don't understand what should be changed and how.

13. november 2005, 08:32:29
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
grenv: It is not recommended to use the browser's Back button on a site like this one where all pages are dynamic.

11. november 2005, 10:03:21
Fencer 
I've added it to the rules.

6. november 2005, 20:03:47
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Resignation warning...
playBunny: I've just made it in red font. But I must also kind of agree with Pedro.

2. november 2005, 08:05:09
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Grasshopper
pgt: Cool, let me know if you were successful.
Something different - does anybody play Grasshopper? Would it be interesting to implement it here?

2. november 2005, 07:11:27
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here
alanback: You are absolutely right.

2. november 2005, 07:10:25
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here
pgt: Absolutely wrong. My time is best spent on making myself happy. Which makes any kind of autopass impossible to be here.

26. oktober 2005, 19:02:14
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: match vs game etiquette etc
grenv: I don't want to change the system only because of the cube.

20. oktober 2005, 18:13:24
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: The warning...
playBunny: 1) I am the only one who specifies my own responsibilities.
2) Reposting someone else's posts or private messages without his permission is against the user agreement.

<< <   1 2   > >>
Datum en tijd
Aanwezige vrienden
Favoriete Forums
Genootschappen
Tip van de dag
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
Terug naar boven