Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Paard.
One of the cool things I like about LittleGolem.net is that they actually have "charts" of each persons rating, so you can watch how you improved/droped rating.
BBW: Yes, the deadline time can be added to the list of team tournaments.
LJ: Such banning is not supported yet but can be easily added.
grenv: BK doesn't keep these data. I would have to recalculate all BKRs from the very start, based on all finished games. I will think it over.
thought you publicly said you wouldnt remove me from your tourney , your word is not worth jack.
ps banning people from joining at all would be good "stops people like longjohn from re-joining at the last minute "
no it wasnt even five in line lol only gammons , longjohn talks rubbish .
im actually undecided which is longjohn in the picture lol ;))
so either one of these players requested my removal , zockerdotcom , Erinity , sissie44 or you are a liar !!!!!!!
The above is one of the cool things about LittleGolem, you can look at charts of your ratings and how they have changed. If you look at the above chart (for Golem Word Game), it shows that I started around 1500 in 2002, went up - and notice I did not play for about a year or so, and recently just played a few games which has changed my rating a little.
What if both players had requested the removal of the other? Or if every player had requested the removal of those listed next to them? Etbleedin'cetera.
I personally have never asked for removal of a player from a tournament, but have told the organiser that if he/she played i would not... to be told that the possibility of me coming up against the player in question was very remote. My answer to that was, well I would NEVER play him/her I would rather resign against him/her.
Now I do not know if the person concerned removed him/herself or was removed by the tourney organiser...and personally "I couldn't give a damn"
The bug tracker is a great idea. Since, at times, there are messages back and forth about the bug there, it would be nice if there was a red number indicating new messages in the bug tracker in that specific "bug"(Like with discussion boards).
(For times when the person reporting the bug updates, or you respond about it, or someone else comments on the bug)
What about an e-mail notification for all users discussing a particular bug when a new comment is added?
Actually, it already works but only for me :-)
What is that in USD?
Also, does it include a new server too?
While I have your ear.... Can you make a new public debate board, with me as moderator?
Thank you so much, as it is needed to keep debates from the general chat, and since pawns cant join the fellowship debate boards....
The notification by a message was my other thought, Fencer. I was thinking a personal message here on the site, though, not necesarilly an email. (Or is that what you meant?)
Onderwerp: for Fencer, reposted from the Gothic Board
I like experimenting with new variants of just about everything. I know there are plenty of feature requests to Fencer for new games, but he is only one person and can only program so fast. However, the goth board and other chess variants are already programmed on BK, so it wouldn't take too much more time to combine the two. I believe Goth would combine very well with other variants, especially extinction, loop, dark (!!), 3 checks, anti and maaaybe atomic (we'd have to see if white has too great of an advantage). I would love to see those combined variants.
on battleboats, there is an option for "Random placement of remaining pieces".
When you choose this, there is an option to either save or clear the random placement. Sometimes, I don't like the placement. It would be nice to have another option to regenerate random positions.
It was discussed a while ago regarding combining chess variants. Fencer said it would be extrememly simple to add combination variants with the way the system is currently set up. However, where does it stop?
Dark Gothic, Loop Gothic, Extinction Gothic, 3-checks Gothic, Dark Janus, Loop Janus, Extinction Janus, 3-checks Janus, Dark Loop Gothic, Dark Loop Janus, Dark loop, Dark 3-checks Gothic, Dark 3-checks Janus, Dark 3-checks, Dark Extinction, Dark Extinction Gothic, Dark Extinction Janus, and on, and on, and on...Not only would it be very difficult to distinguish these games (aside from the name at the top - not a big problem), but it would simply be WAY too many games and would be almost identical.
How about dark and loop tabluts? I've no idea how viable they'd be but if it's easy to do, they'd be fun to try a few times. (And so far there are no tablut variants.)
Loop Battleboats Plus - now that would be interesting (and a longer game)
After you sink your oppenets ship, you can then instead of taking your turn to shot, place the boat you just captured back in play. AND what is cool is that it can be placed in a spot where your oppenet already shot - so a player would also need the ability to shot at the same square multiply times during a game.
Then since it is Plus, you could possible have 9 boats with 9 shots per turn.
There are some fun ideas, for example dark three checks extinction chess. The number of pieces that would qualify as a checkable would increase with captures, would the balance of checks be cancelled after a capture, plenty of things to work with in mixed variants.
(verberg) Als u een ouder bericht van een bepaalde speler wilt vinden, klik dan op zijn/haar Profiel en gebruik de knop "toon berichten van deze speler" bovenaan de pagina. (konec) (laat alle tips zien)