playBunny: Well i didn't design that page nor i have any participation or relation to them so i don't care.....
ps. There are no 3 tests! and then Well i said that the 3 boxes there were no 3 tests... Actually you implied the 3 boxes, which isn't the same.
I didn't implied the 3 boxes. It's what i take for granted that we speak about the first 3 boxes!
Here is why:
I answered to WhiteTower's question that was(the important part is shown with bold):
"Well, that "tester" tells me my Java is OK, but "I can NOT do applets", which is ridiculously wrong :) I mean, how can it say "indeed" in the first 2 tests and "NOT" in the third???
and i said:
"There are no 3 tests!"
meaning:
"There are no 3 tests in the 3 boxes you said!"
that means:
"There are no 3 tests in the first 3 boxes in that page."
so you see that i didn't mean:
"There are no 3 tests in that page!"
(verberg) Geen zin meer om voor elk potje Zeeslag of Spionage steeds weer alle stukken te moeten plaatsen? Ga dan naar Spelbouwers om daar een paar van uw favoriete beginopstellingen voor toekomstig gebruik op te slaan. (pauloaguia) (laat alle tips zien)