Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Liste over diskusjonsforum
Du kan ikke skrive meldinger i dette forumet. For å kunne skrive her må ha et Brain Pawn medlemskap eller høyere.
Step forward, Chick Fil-A: a fast food chain with more than 1,600 branches across America, and roots firmly in the evangelical conservative camp. Stores don't open on Sundays, and the firm has a history of supporting anti-gay efforts, according to the lobby group Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD). They claim the company has backed groups that say being gay should be recriminalised, and others that support 'ex-gay' therapy.
But it was an interview by CEO Dan Cathy, in the Baptist Press, that has turned Chick Fil-A into a conservative cause celebre: especially the bit where he publicly affirmed his traditional views on marriage. Chick Fil-A, he said, was "very much supportive of the family - the biblical definition of the family unit".
Liberals demanded a boycott, backed by celebrities including Mia Farrow and Roseanne Barr, while some city mayors even tried to ban the chain from their district. Washington DC mayor Vincent Gray denounced what he called "hate chicken", while Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel declared the chain's values "are not Chicago values"......
......And naturally, when there's a conservative cause to bang a drum for, Sarah Palin was next on the scene, posting a photograph of herself and Todd on her Facebook page, clutching a bag of fried chicken.
While brand approval for Chick Fil-A was dropping through the floor, Palin told Fox News that the backlash was having "a chilling effect on our First Amendment rights [to free speech]".
The chicken chain isn't the first to plunge headlong into poltical controversy, although experts have warned it's rarely good for business.
Retail giant Target became a target itself back in 2010, when organisations including MoveOn.org launched pickets and protests over the firm's decision to donate $150,000 to a Republican candidate in Minnesota who had a history of opposing gay rights.
Weeks of public pressure soon got shareholders worried; democracy, said activists, was not for sale......
....As huge queues snaked around the block outside branches of Chick Fil-A, police were even called in to keep order in Madison, Alabama. Another former Presidential hopeful, Rick Santorum, picked up lunch: "OK leftists go crazy", he posted on Twitter.
As Talking Points Memo reports, it all sparked something of a media frenzy, as cable news networks sent news choppers into the sky to report the drama as it happened. Yes folks, it's August: something of a slow news month.
Yet the fact remains that a fast food chain managed to draw the kind of crowds that most politicians can only dream of.
Gay rights groups are fighting back - calling on same-sex couples to photograph themselves kissing in a Chick Fil-A branch, in protest.
In this game of chicken, who will give in first? : thousands of people may have expressed their support for Dan Cathy's firm this week, but experience shows when corporations get involved in political controversy, it rarely ends well.
Fried food, with a super-sized side of politics: it's enough to give you indigestion.
(V): I'm a little conflicted on this one.I don't think there should be a feeding frenzy attacking an anti gay marriage stance anymore than there should be attacks on pro gay marriage.Both sides are entitled to an opinion , rightly or wrongly , and if it is voiced respectfully and peacefully.The " witch hunt" mentality isn't attractive from either side, and having the usual crowd like Palin trying to gain political bandwagon points is sadly typical.This type of behaviour actually vindicates the same type of response to another company stating a pro gay marriage stance
It would be difficult not to be if it was given any thought, which apparently you have. I'm not conflicted because in my opinion an "it's all about me" attitude will always backfire on the one who has that mindset.
Reminds me of a passing remark I heard from someone. He said, "Thinking is over-rated." I said "That's what I thought."
The Col: My only problem with the anti gay marriage lot is the wrongful interpretation of alot of the passages. As far as I remember being gay (as in man gay) is not against God, the act is.. but I wonder how much of that is regarding rape, and the sin of ejaculation outside the vagina. Female to Female acts are not forbidden which hints it's more about wasting sperm, which at the time was considered what makes biological life solely.. Temple sex was forbidden by God in the OT.
It's a strange lot..
Other than that.. Both sides have a right to an opinion, but Politicians using it as a baby kissing opportunity.
(V): When you consider marriage has about a 50/50 success rate these days, I wonder why gay people are so keen on joining such an iffy proposition other than for the legal aspects.I don't see the need for marriage regardless of the sexual preference, but I support the access to marriage for gay couples 100%
(hjem) Spill et spill i "real time" med en motspiller som er online! For at dette skal være mulig må både du og motspilleren velge "Flytt, og bli stående" som fast valg, og så laste siden på nytt med F5-tasten. (TeamBundy) (Vis alle tips)