Bruker navn: Passord:
Registrering av ny bruker
Moderator: Walter Montego 
 Chess variants (10x8)

Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as
Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too


For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position
... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Liste over diskusjonsforum
Modus: Alle kan skrive
Søk i meldingene:  

16. august 2004, 12:00:11
Chessmaster1000 
Modifisert av Chessmaster1000 (16. august 2004, 12:04:00)
<>It's modified Capablanca Chess and you didn't make it up except for changing the initial >positioning of the pieces.

Although the change seems rather easy to make and not something different and revolutionary, it is actually a huge change! While Capablenca Chess gives to the white side a big advantage, Gothic Chess keeps both sides equal. Just like a game must be.
So it is a big deal the modification Ed Trice did, as it transformed an unequal game to something playable and fun after all.


>I'm the best Building player in the world, but do you hear me continuously carping about it, >or putting people down that don't play as well as me?

Can you please tell me what game this is? (Building) Or provide me a link to find the rules for it.


>Help from everyone else about these three. Should I ban them all, one or two of them, or >none of them? Should I stay on as moderator?

These are not real questions since i found you a very clever person,so i trust your decisions, but here is my opinion.
I think in your post about QuoUsque you are a bit unfair about him ("Fine, you're a good player of it. Why keep pounding it into us?").
He never said that he is superior to anyone else. Well almost anyone except Danoschek. But even then he didn't say it clearly, but he started calling Danoschek a chicken. That was his only fault in my opinion.
As for Danoschek i don't really read his posts as when i'm doing it i feel a little dizzy, while trying to decode his statements and all the ~*~:)0-(.

My vote is to bring back both of them, but Danoschek has to start speaking English ((Can he?) I couldn't avoid this comment! Sorry.) while QuoUsque should avoid talking about Danoschek.
As for the third person you were talking i have no idea.

Dato og tid
Innloggede venner
Favorittforum
Laug
Dagens tips
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Tilbake til toppen