Difference: 9 COMPUTER frogs are put on the board randomly. (There is no player 1 / player 2 frogs)
So each player is looking for the same frogs. So when you find an area that a frog is in, you can either (1) take a wild guess, (2) try to reveal more info - which will help your opponent or (3) go shoot somewhere else and see if your opponent will do either 1 or 2.
This game will encourage more guessing since you will not want to shot until you know 100% sure where the frog is since your opponent will then have a chance to guess where the frog is and get the points.
So what do people think? Similar setup to Frog Finder, but totally different strategy to play it!
joshi tm: I say 9 because I know most people don't like longer games - for example, the game Froglet - the game was fun for myself & others at first for awhile, but then when games took so long and seem to drag out, at least for myself - those games are less fun. (so a smaller board version of Froglet is still a suggestion I make)
But anyway, back to Frog Finder Co-op. I say 9 to keep it small - but possible have a big variant at a later day with something like 15 or even up to 21 could be a fun variant. But from my years of playing games, smaller & shorter games seem to be more popular in the long run.
At least that is my reasoning for picking 9 as the number of frogs to find (since it is close to the current 10, and with 9 will hopefully help make sure there are less ties then if there were 10 frogs on the board)
(esconder) Se pretende jogar um jogo contra um adversário com capacidades semelhantes, pode definir uma gama para o BKR do adversário, quando cria um novo convite de jogo. Dessa forma ninguém com um BKR fora dessa gama poderá ver/aceitar o convite. (Katechka) (mostrar todas as dicas)