Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Czuch: If we had "civil unions" for everyone - gay or straight - then I would agree with u. But that is not the case. I feel sure that heterosexuals would be indignant about having their marriage rights diminished to those granted only to 'Civil Unions'. Thus, we have a 2 teired system of one set of rights for Civil Unions & a d1ferent one for marraige. Thus, u have discrimination unless u grant marriage equality to everyone.
(esconder) Se pretende saudar alguém na sua língua nativa consulte o nosso Dicionário do Jogador, acessível através do link "mais acerca das línguas", por baixo das bandeiras. (pauloaguia) (mostrar todas as dicas)