Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
(V): The US may have the resources for "Green Energy" but the technology just isn't there. There is likely potential, but the actual technology to produce the vast quantities of energy needed just isn't possible technologically at this point. One oil well can supply far more than a multitude of green energy sources. It's not my opinion on the matter, it's just the facts we are currently facing. There is no possible way to replace fossel fuels with green energy. We are still in the very early stages of discovery. Yes we have found green energy sources, but the output is limited. And in the meanwhile, other countries around the world will continue to produce oil based products and unless the US does too, it will be at the mercy of others. Exploring green energy sources is one thing. But we cannot talk ahead of the game. We are not at a point where green energy can sustain people's energy needs on larger scales. In theory perhaps, but in practice, no.
(esconder) Se apenas lê regularmente alguns fóruns, pode adicioná-los à sua lista de fóruns favoritos indo à página desse Fórum e clicando no link "Adicionar à minha lista de fóruns favoritos". (pauloaguia) (mostrar todas as dicas)