 |
|
 Chess variants (10x8)Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy) - information about upcoming tournaments - disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Вам не разрешено писать сообщения на этом форуме. Минимальный статус, требуемый для того, чтобы писать на этом форуме - Мозговая Пешка. Режим: Каждый может объявить
7. Июля 2013, 09:01:28 Субъект: Move analysis for soundness Embassy Chess (Walter Montego vs. Beleg) This recently completed game has me wondering if my 17th move was sound. I moved 17 B G3-I5. My opponent captured the Bishop with his Rook Pawn and the rest of the moves led to a forced checkmate. I had plans for many other moves he might make, but I can't say for sure if he could've made me pay a price for this move, or if I had all the bases covered. 8. Июля 2013, 17:22:30 Субъект: Re: Move analysis for soundness Walter Montego: Looks like no decent square for the attacked Marshall, but what would you play on Nc5 attacking your Queen and making a bit of room for the black Q and K? 8. Июля 2013, 23:26:48 Субъект: Re: Move analysis for soundness Beren the 32nd: I was going to reply B × B E4-H7, but this won't work after you move the Knight. I'll think some on it. |
Дата и время
Друзья в сети
Любимые форумы
Клубы
Советы
|
|
Копирайт © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рахунек, все права зарезервированы. Наверх |