User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57   > >>
23. November 2014, 23:31:46
Aganju 
I'd rather play an opponent with moist fingers than a dice cheater...

23. November 2014, 20:08:12
speachless 
Subject: Re: Multiple personality
badgerboy78: so he needs a 2. account to unsure his rating, how poor from him. DiceCheater/Moistfinger was by the way involved in the last couple of discussions about slow player and he often complained as mucht, that the moderator deleted some of his flaming posts. Well, now it's official I don't need anymore to take DiceCheater serious in any discussions, to have a 2nd active account is ridiculous and poor.

23. November 2014, 18:54:32
badgerboy78 
Subject: Multiple personality
Moistfinger is DiceCheater. I think that says it all.

23. November 2014, 18:48:24
Purple 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
Dice Cheater: Tournaments can and should be fun but not under these conditions.

23. November 2014, 18:47:12
Justaminute 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
Dice Cheater: You don't go in for multi nicks by any chance.

23. November 2014, 18:33:23
Dice Cheater 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
Aganju: I did say I do not tournaments. I merely replied to Gabriel Almeida's post.

23. November 2014, 17:59:55
Aganju 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
moistfinger: Funny that this discussion comes back up over and over and over again, always with the same vehement arguing, and always with the same results (none). If you scroll down a while, you can read several dozen such discussions, each with several dozens of arguments made, so maybe we can not have it all again?
There is no solution, not here and not on any other gaming website.
Either do not join tournaments where the time settings are not according to your liking, or endure their duration; no other choices.

23. November 2014, 16:22:31
moistfinger 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
Gabriel Almeida: Good lord, what a joke! But not really a surprise and entirely symptomatic of what is happening to this website; it's the main reason why I never play tournaments anymore. There are players here - quite a lot of them unfortunately - whose idea of fun is to stretch out games as far as possible by using all the tricks in the book to abuse the Time per Move setting. The reasoning behind this is anyone's guess but my own view would make some wince so I'll keep it to myself. You ask is it normal? Of course it's not normal, it's deranged. I have seen posts on these boards vehemently defending the time out settings and the slow players so I suggest we should have two Brainkings, one for the jokers and another for the players interested in a reasonably quick and interesting game, call it slow-brain and fast-brain, whatever... but make it happen.

23. November 2014, 16:17:07
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
BGBedlam: Maybe, my friend!
Both situations must make us think about them:
1) Why a tournament is played for 8 years? Is it positive? It was that the idea since the begginning?
2) Why, 8 years after, some of the most active players of 2007 are not playing in 2014 in Brainking?

23. November 2014, 16:10:56
BGBedlam 
Subject: Re: Slow players - slow tournaments
Gabriel Almeida: Is this a testament to a once glorious past?

23. November 2014, 14:59:16
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Slow players - slow tournaments
Look at this tournament, still running. Started 21/01/2007.
8 years to play a tournament, is it normal?
Now we have a final match between 3 "ghost-felowships", maybe 50% of the games won for time-out. We have games where BOTH players don't play in BK since a long time.
WOW!!!

10. November 2014, 10:48:33
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: bug?
Gabriel Almeida: I did and the picture came up with the song.

10. November 2014, 10:47:09
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: bug?
crosseyed: See my picture and my profile... Tom Waits is my musical super-hero! :)

10. November 2014, 10:45:16
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: bug?
Gabriel Almeida: Well done. What a gruff voice he has.

10. November 2014, 10:42:29
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: bug?

8. November 2014, 02:58:52
Bernice 
OK...thanks :)

8. November 2014, 01:40:38
Doris 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: My log in has always been at the top of the page for me too. The log out is on the left side bottom.

8. November 2014, 00:16:59
beach 
Subject: Re:


Bernice: my log in has always been at the top  perhaps you changed something in your settings





7. November 2014, 23:55:31
Bernice 
has there been some work done on the site??? I am working off my laptop win8 and the login is at the very top of the page, instead of down the left hand side....is it version 8 doing this or what????

6. November 2014, 22:03:21
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: bug?
Gabriel Almeida: I was told to be wary of strange men.

6. November 2014, 20:25:21
Hud 
Subject: smiling
i never post, but i had to say the last four exchanges made my day.

6. November 2014, 10:32:27
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: bug?

crosseyed: lol... wanna be my friend, cross? :D


 


31. October 2014, 00:44:08
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: bug?
Gabriel Almeida: Oi!

29. October 2014, 01:06:46
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: bug?
Welsh Coast: Never trust in a woman that says she wants to be your friend! :)

27. October 2014, 09:56:45
Green Meadow 
Subject: bug?
One of my friends was showing online, when she logged out she is no longer in my friends list and had to be added again??

25. October 2014, 22:10:28
Marshmud 
Its really not so easy to determine a price. many areas are evaluated, not just membership but revenue from advertisements and daily hits. None of the sites mention have any calculation for a site not running at 100% and in need of repairs, just like buying a used car or house. The owner sets the tone for a sale.

25. October 2014, 16:09:43
vino 
Hello, do you want to play poker?

25. October 2014, 03:55:22
Bernice 
brainking.com is worth $ 18,377 - Worth Of Web Calculator


brainking.com is worth $ 40,200.00 - Cutestat.pl

www.brainking.com website worth is $ 30,343 siteworth

w3snoop.com/‎Cached
The website brainking.com is expected to be earning an estimated $5 USD on a
daily basis. If brainking.com was to be sold it would possibly be worth $1,795 ...


brainking.cz is expected to be earning an estimated $0 USD per day
. If brainking.cz was to be sold it would possibly be worth $45 USD

25. October 2014, 01:14:14
Aganju 
Subject: Re: this site...
ketchuplover: for example. There is a dozen other such tools in the web (and each one gives a vastly different price...).

24. October 2014, 22:17:58
ketchuplover 
Subject: Re: this site...
Bwild:

via siteprice.org

24. October 2014, 17:16:48
Bwild 
Subject: Re: this site...
ketchuplover: really....and to think 10 years ago I could have bought it for 50 lol
how do you come up with "alleged" pricing for websites?

24. October 2014, 14:35:38
SL-Mark 
Subject: Re: this site...
ketchuplover: I would willingly pay more for a litre of water were I in the middle of a desert, than I would being in the middle of Scotland.

24. October 2014, 11:32:55
ketchuplover 
Subject: this site...
is allegedly worth $27,468

22. October 2014, 11:37:58
ThunderGr 
Subject: Private Tournaments
When you invite players to your tournaments, is there a way to know whom you have already invited, so that you avoid bothering people that would not like to participate with multiple invitations?

22. October 2014, 10:58:45
Thom27 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Carpe Diem: I forgot: to make it work, one should check "no days off", or the victim will be saved by the vacation (unless they have used it up already)

No, I don't want to seriously advice to do this, but the players should be aware of it. Onee should care about the time settings and not complain if one didn't. And it can of course be reasonable to choose such time settings, as Aganju mentioned.

It is only fun and games, until someone loses temper.

21. October 2014, 09:59:31
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
ThunderGr: 3 days and 16:30 :)

thats why i have my weekend days which give a dead time of less than 2 days for normal games ... and as i still have 19 vacation days left for the rest of this year, that seems to be fine

for games with green or red dots (fisher clock games) i can have a dead time of more than 3 days though, so i have to chose my games/tournaments carefully and usually login once or twice during my weekends to save the time pool ... it happened a couple of times where i didnt manage that this year though so i think i timed out in 4 games this year .. the rest i lost within the time limits :)

(not counting the tournament which started in the weekend which i didnt realize, where i lost all first games of the matches :))

my "tip" was meant sarcastically :-) ... the purpose of this site is to play games, not to try to let your opponent timeout :)

most opponents will try to cooperate with your time limits if you ask them .. you cant expect them to pay attention to it all the time ... the responsibility of the timecontrol of my games is fully mine

i had some very nice opponents save our games with fast time limits lately :)

21. October 2014, 09:38:25
ThunderGr 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Hrqls: Hm. 4 days "dead time" per week is certainly long...Your tip is a bit hard to follow. Unless an opponent specifically requests that I give him some time due to x reason and not play my move as soon as I am inclined to(my OCD hates logging off Brainking with games still on my turn), I will not pay any attention to a player's "dead time". It is everyone's responsibility to take games that can fit to their regular schedule but, since we are humans and sh*t happens, a reasonable request for some time will be respected by me, due to special circumstances.

21. October 2014, 09:11:04
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Tip: learn to know your opponents playing times ...

For example: my "dead time" is between thursday 17:00 and monday 9:30

so if you want to win against me on timeout, then make sure i will have little time left on a game, and make your move on thursday evening (cet) .. there might be a chance that i wont make my next move until monday morning 9:30 (cet)

or if you want to win our game by your own skills then make sure you make your last move before thursday 17:00 to give me time until monday morning 9:30 :)

but above all: it is my own responsibility wether i timeout or not, you are not to blame for it

21. October 2014, 08:25:38
ThunderGr 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Thom27: Nice warning Thom. One should always be mindful of the time controls of a game they accept/take and *avoid taking them* if they cannot meet the requirements. Having your games taken by a player that time forfeits on move 1 is quite irritating and people doing that end up in my blocked players list the second time they do it.

When I was posting games with such time controls, I used to put a warning in the text for those considering to take them. Nonetheless, people kept time-forfeiting. This is why I stopped posting Fischer Time games. I do not enjoy time forfeits. I like quick time controls because I want my games to end in a reasonable time but the point is to *play* the game, not just win it and, *especially* not win it by time forfeit.

My post was meant to help people with few games allowance that have to wait for ages their opponents to play a move, just because of poor time control definition, not to be a "guide to luring your opponent into time forfeits". :p

21. October 2014, 07:21:07
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Modified by Hrqls (21. October 2014, 07:21:48)
Thom27: this will not make the slower players move faster .. they will just timeout in those fast games, but that doesnt make them use up their vacation days or let them move faster in other games

Aganju: you are correct, it is totally the fault of the one accepting the game .. i am on the other other side of this lately as my weekends seem to be quite busy, too busy to play games .. and have timed out in a couple of games lately, but i blame it all on me

i turn down all fisher clock invitations, but once in a while i do join a fisher clock tournament: when either the reward is nice, or when i like the tournament because of its organizer or theme and i want it to have a nice amount of participants ....

joining fisher clock tournaments is a bit of a gamble for me ... a lot depends on the timezones of my opponents .... i expect to lose 1 or 2 matches in the tournament, but hope to win enough of the other matches to move on to the next round ... but of course i try to win them all without timeouts :)

21. October 2014, 01:08:32
Aganju 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Thom27: Don't forget that it is their fault for accepting. I feel incorrectly blamed being at the other end of this- i often put out public game invites with such time limits, because I want to *play* not *wait* around, and - who is surprised- about half of my invites are taking by people in that situation, and then lost on time. What would you recommend me to do? Warn them at every move? Resign when I see it coming???

21. October 2014, 01:02:36
Carpe Diem 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Modified by Carpe Diem (21. October 2014, 01:03:26)
Thom27: Are you advocating for people to try to earn forfeits, or warning others about those who do that kind of thing?


Hopefully the latter, as it doesn't sound like the kind of behaviour that should be encouraged.

21. October 2014, 00:17:59
moistfinger 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
Thom27: Nice one, I like your style Thom27!!!

20. October 2014, 22:28:52
Thom27 
Subject: Re: A piece of advice to Brain Pawns(and those that like fast games)
ThunderGr: I want to add that there is a way to lure players into timeouts who have many games running and frequently play the urgent games only, until there is no game with, say, less than 2 days until timeout on the list:

invite them to agame or set up a tournament with fischer time with high initial time and a low bonus, e.g. 12 days + 6 hours per move. If the time has almost run out and a move is made, then after the next opponent's move the time will be only 6 hours until timeout, and this may be at any time, maybe in the night, and when the player comes back next afternoon, the game is forfeited.

I run into this occasionally.

19. October 2014, 00:30:59
BGBedlam 
Subject: Re: team tournament query
Brian1971: Well, I've changed the team now. Thanks Brian.

18. October 2014, 23:14:38
Brian1971 
Subject: Re: team tournament query
BGBedlam: I have a similar situation with my team for dark battleboats. We are not officially signup yet but have enough players except one of the players has his brain knight membership ending after today and the system would not allow us to sign up the team.

18. October 2014, 21:52:54
BGBedlam 
Subject: team tournament query
Hi guys. I have already signed up oleg2008 in my team tournament. He has recently informed me that his brain rook status has expired. Will I still be able to play him in the team tournament? The tournament starts in 6 days.

15. October 2014, 02:09:32
Aganju 
Subject: Re: speed
beach: absolutely fine for me (Florida)

15. October 2014, 01:35:46
beach 
Subject: Re: speed
Royal__Flush:  been slow for about a hour for me

15. October 2014, 01:34:08
Royal__Flush 
Subject: speed
Have things been running slow the last few hours for anybody else or is just me?

<< <   48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top