Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Artful Dodger: Item, there is no acknowledge for terrorists. Not even if a government acts in non acceptable ways. It is impossible to condone the killings of innocent, when I don't even support the killing of offenders.
Among the mechanisms of terrorism there is something I can't ignore, which is that missing transparency is the excuse for terrorists to do something, no matter what. Missing transparency puts the lives of innocents in danger IMO.
All, at least so many statesman I can think of suffer from mobbed-up deseases, they get in trouble very fast once in office, and their stake on terrorism is to provoke it. Deliberately I phrase this strait away, I'd like to ignore the propaganda and anger that walks with the war against terror.
On the other hand side, terror organisations are low life like probably nothing else. Some counties aren't able to get rid of it, and the world is thankful about the US help. This is true for the countries that have to deal with Al Quaida and similar IMO. I think the Bush administration idioty was to size up the terror problem from local low lifers to a global world freedom threat. This is ridiculous, I think that since 2003 Europe was united in seeing Bush as a global threat.
gogul: Very intelligent post. I only have an issue with two points. One is that I am not against the killing of the offenders. On the contrary, I want them all killed.
As for Bush being a global threat, I don't agree. His job was not to placate the countries of the world but to keep America safe. He brought the war to the terrorists. They wanna blow up buildings and strap on bombs and blow up kids. The US only help rid the world of such as these.
I'd never vote for Bush again but he's better than that lying snake 'Al Gore. And anyone is better than Obama. Obama is giving the US away and dismantling all its powers. Even Bush is better than an Obama.
Argomento: Re:He brought the war to the terrorists
Artful Dodger: ... In Afghanistan... ok.... But there were none in Iraq. Unless this is part of some long term policy to get Iran and other country's in the area.
(nascondi) Puoi inviare un messaggio ai tuoi amici con un solo click aggiungendoli alla tua lista degli utenti amici e poi cliccando sulla piccola busta accanto al loro nome. (pauloaguia) (mostra tutti i suggerimenti)