 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
19. Giugno 2010, 16:27:41 .. conspiracy theory.  The bloggers dream. 19. Giugno 2010, 16:59:05 Argomento: Re:  (V): Perhaps not a conspiracy but then it's a show of complete incompetence. 19. Giugno 2010, 19:04:54 Argomento: Re: Artful Dodger: Um.. how? All I see is C&P conspiracy bloggers on overload. 19. Giugno 2010, 19:29:35 Argomento: Re: (V): You think Obama has handled this oil spill in the right way? 19. Giugno 2010, 21:16:54 Argomento: Re: Artful Dodger: I think there has been a lot of confusion over the nature and size of the leak. I also think that much of the real effort to seal the leak is through BP and other oil experts. I hear that no matter what when the hurricane season starts those relief oil wells better be in place as no booms or skimmers are gonna make a damn difference. 20. Giugno 2010, 07:05:37 Argomento: Re: (V): Hurricanes are the nightmere scenario, it would be raining oil. not men. 20. Giugno 2010, 12:04:45 Argomento: Re: Jim Dandy: I don't think there is any technology that could stop oil being blown inland under such conditions. Realistically.. I cannot understand why BP cut safety, it's not as they don't make enough money already in profit that a few million extra, to have installed the full safety equipment as they were advised to would have made any difference. Is Capitalism turning into (as some church figures feel) the aNti-ChRisT???? 20. Giugno 2010, 21:22:45 Argomento: Re: (V): The leak = BPs problem The cleanup = US government responsibility + BP. But the US government is mandated to protect our shores. The fault for the lack of cleanup falls directly on Obama. 20. Giugno 2010, 22:59:28 Argomento: Re:The fault for the lack of cleanup falls directly on Obama. Artful Dodger: Rubbish.. It's not like he lied (like Bush and Iraq re links to 9/11) Next you'll be saying the Government should walk on water.  20. Giugno 2010, 23:04:55 Argomento: Re:The fault for the lack of cleanup falls directly on Obama. (V): Accepting needed help when offered is not like walking on water. Approving the requests of the governor of Louisiana in a timely manner is not like walking on water. Acting immediately in a crisis and showing leadership is not like walking on water. What is expected of Obama is to protect the US and use the power of his office to do all he can to contain this spill. He had the resources and he squandered every opportunity. He failed completely. Which is why even the LEFT is highly critical of his leadership.  20. Giugno 2010, 23:08:07 Argomento: Re:The fault for the lack of cleanup falls directly on Obama. Artful Dodger: ... you never answered what equipment does the USA keep to deal with oil leaks. btw... I'm neither left or right I'm me!!  |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |