 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
1. Febbraio 2009, 22:02:05  Weell we survived a cyclone that crossed the coast north of us over night, now all we have to put up with is MORE RAIN and excessive winds............ 1. Febbraio 2009, 22:10:39 Argomento: Re:  Bernice:Zowie! Nasty storms. The mid-west has suffered a huge natural disaster. Lots without power. Mama nature must be on a roll. She's zapping people all over the planet. 1. Febbraio 2009, 23:02:06 Argomento: Re: Artful Dodger: The Wrath of Gore  1. Febbraio 2009, 23:04:12 Argomento: Re: Jim Dandy: lol, I forgot about Jim Dandy!  1. Febbraio 2009, 23:26:50 Argomento: Re: Jim Dandy: Thing is, its another example of democratic no win arguments.... global warming is really a misnomer, what they really mean is that man is responsible for all kinds of climate changes, that include snow and cold, not just warming..... so while they use scare tactics telling us that NY will flood when the Ice caps melt, they also tell you that the ice storm is a result of global warming as well... they just cover everything, and there is no way to prove them wrong, when every weather even is global warming related. I just cant wait to see what they are saying in 10 years, long after their "tipping point with no return", and see what they are saying then.... I am certain they will say that they were wrong, and keep moving the tipping point back more and more... and they have the nerve to call republican the "scare mongers"? 1. Febbraio 2009, 23:45:39 Argomento: Re: Czuch: Besides that, Al Gore's science flies in the face of real science anyway. He just ignores all the evidence to the contrary and forges ahead. Well, at least he has a platform now (global warming is more about Al Gore than it is about facts - and now he has to save his face after an award from Hollow Wood and a Notsonoble Peace Booby-Prize. 1. Febbraio 2009, 23:51:46 Argomento: Re: Czuch: People tend to confuse "global warming" with "heat"...............a cold winter and the nay sayers feel the argument has been quashed.I'm not completely sold on the "global warming prophacy,but the unusually cold and stormy winter we are enduring is not a valid argument,quite the contrary actually.I can understand how some may think "hey,if it was a warm winter you'd also say it validates the argument,you want it both ways" The truth is,our very erratic weather patterns are example enough. 2. Febbraio 2009, 00:31:31 Argomento: Re: Jim Dandy: erratic weather patterns are example enough. Erratic patters are common, there is no science to them, thats why the scare tactics about everything melting is a better tactic |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |